In our all-too-busy lives, we often find ourselves overwhelmed with everyday tasks, making it difficult to know where to start. We might prioritize the tasks we enjoy the most or the ones that take the least time. But as the day goes on, we often realize that there’s no way we’ll be able to complete everything on our to-do list.

Often, we are resistant to asking for help. We therefore bite off more than we can chew, but this can leave us burnt out or with half-complete to-do lists. We might prioritize the wrong tasks and end up having to complete the most important ones late at night. “There must be a better way,” we find ourselves thinking.

Studies of human behavior have shown that people are very good at identifying and completing tasks that are both important and urgent, and assigning a low priority to tasks that are unimportant and nonurgent.9 What we’re not so good at is prioritizing important (but perhaps not urgent) tasks over those that are urgent or feel urgent. We’re all familiar with this feeling—it’s called the ‘urgency trap’ or the ‘mere-urgency effect.’ 

The Eisenhower Matrix is a time-management strategy that helps you determine which tasks should be prioritized, which can be delegated, and which can be tackled at a later time—or not at all. 

The basic premise of the Eisenhower Matrix is that tasks can be categorized by urgency and importance. According to the matrix, important tasks are defined as larger projects related to our career goals and strategic planning initiatives. Urgent tasks are the smaller activities that need to be addressed in the short term, usually quickly and easily. 

The Eisenhower Matrix is a four-category tool consisting of two columns and two rows. The columns are labeled ‘urgent’ and ‘not urgent’, and the rows are labeled ‘important’ and ‘not important’.² Depending on which category your activities fall into, there are strategies for how best to deal with each one.

Activities in the urgent and important category should be done immediately, like preparing for a meeting that starts in an hour or handling a client crisis. Activities that are not urgent but important should be scheduled for a later date, but you must ensure to stick to that schedule and not put them off. This could include going to a routine health check-up or meeting up with a loved one. Activities in the urgent and not important section, like replying to emails or booking travel, should be delegated to someone else. Lastly, activities in the not urgent and not important category should be deleted altogether.² This might include scrolling social media, rearranging a perfectly tidy room, or online shopping for items you don’t need. 

Quadrant 1: Do First (Urgent & Important)

Tasks that require immediate attention and are critical for success.

Quadrant 2: Schedule (Important but Not Urgent)

Tasks that contribute to long-term goals and success but don’t require immediate attention.

Quadrant 3: Delegate (Urgent but Not Important)

Tasks that demand immediate attention but do not require your expertise.

Quadrant 4: Don’t Do (Not Urgent & Not Important)

Tasks that do not contribute to productivity or long-term success.

According to proponents of the matrix, most of us spend too much time working in the wrong quadrants: that is, numbers 3 and 4.¹² Instead, we should be focusing our attention on quadrant two: important but not urgent.

If you’ve ever postponed something that you could have done today, you’ll be familiar with the struggle of knowing what to prioritize. While on the outside it may look like we’re just being lazy, we’re actually trying to overcome various cognitive biases that impede our ability to manage our time effectively and efficiently.

The projection bias causes us to take on big tasks when we feel optimistic, inaccurately projecting that we will continue to feel that way in the future. Similarly, the optimism bias leads us to believe we are going to be more efficient than we are, so we might take on a task that is too big for us to handle alone. Bikeshedding describes our tendency to spend too much time on menial tasks because it is easier to have an opinion on simpler matters than to try and tackle the complex ones. The restraint bias causes us to overestimate the level of control we have over our impulse behaviors and underestimate how distracted we might get while trying to complete our to-do list.

Matrix: A structured framework used to organize, analyze, and show the relationship between information in a grid format with rows and columns.

Mere-Urgency Effect: A cognitive bias where people tend to prioritize urgent tasks over important ones, even when the urgent tasks have a lower value. This happens because urgency creates a sense of immediate action, making people feel productive, while important tasks (especially those without immediate deadlines) are often postponed.

Projection Bias: The tendency for people to overestimate how much their future preferences, emotions, or behaviors will match their current state. This can lead to poor decision-making, as individuals assume they will feel the same way in the future as they do now.

Decision Fatigue: The mental exhaustion that occurs after making too many decisions, leading to impaired judgment, reduced willpower, and reliance on shortcuts (e.g., impulsive choices or avoiding decisions altogether).

Optimism Bias: A cognitive bias where people tend to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes and underestimate potential risks in their future. This can lead people to have unrealistic expectations, such as believing bad things are less likely to happen to them compared to others.

Bikeshedding: Also known as Parkinson’s Law of Triviality, bikeshedding is a cognitive bias where people spend too much time on trivial or easy-to-understand tasks while neglecting more complex or important issues. 

Restraint Bias: The tendency of people to overestimate their ability to control impulses, leading them to put themselves in tempting situations that they believe they can resist. This overconfidence often results in poor self-control and an increased likelihood of giving in to temptations. 

The Sung Diagram: A visual model used to represent the interaction between urgency and importance while emphasizing the psychological impact of tasks.

The Eisenhower Matrix is named after the 34th President of the United States, Dwight D. Eisenhower, who served in office from 1953 to 1961. Before being elected as President, Eisenhower had an impressive career in the American army. He served during World War I and later wrote a guidebook of its battlefields. He also served in France, Washington, the Philippines, and World War II.³ Eisenhower was recognized by the Army Chief for his role in planning military exercises with almost 50,000 troops. He continued to increase in ranks over the years as a result of his impressive knowledge, effective organization, and social skills that enabled him to get along with others and mediate relationships.³ This ability got the attention of both the Democratic and Republican parties who wanted Eisenhower to represent them. He retired from the military after 37 years of service to represent the Republican party, with Richard Nixon as his Vice President.

Eisenhower was a very busy man with a multitude of responsibilities. He was incredibly accomplished and was able to manage his different roles with tact, grace, and efficiency. After his terms as President, Eisenhower delivered a speech to the Second Assembly of the World Council of Churches, a fellowship of churches. In his speech, he quoted J. Roscoe Miller, the 12th president of Northwestern University, who said, “The urgent are not important, and the important are never urgent.”⁴

Eisenhower understood that time management needed to be both effective and efficient, and he wanted to help individuals navigate their priorities. Inspired by Miller, Eisenhower claimed that to be successful, one had to do things that were both urgent and important. Thus, the Eisenhower decision matrix template was born.

Since then, the Eisenhower Matrix has been applied as a simple decision-making tool adapted to fit numerous fields, including business leadership, education, healthcare, personal productivity, and life coaching. In his popular book, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, American educator and businessman Stephen Covey builds on the Eisenhower Matrix. He introduces his Time Management Matrix, a tool designed to help individuals focus on tasks that bring meaningful results rather than just reacting to urgency. Like Eisenhower, Covey categorizes tasks into four groups: necessity (urgent and important), effectiveness (important but not urgent), distraction (urgent but not important), and waste (neither important nor urgent). 

Unlike the Eisenhower Matrix, which is more task-based, Covey’s approach is about prioritizing personal and professional effectiveness. Covey believes that quadrant two is the most important as it helps people focus on proactive, growth-oriented tasks rather than just reacting to urgent matters. 

Dwight D. Eisenhower: Former president of the United States and five-star General in the army, Dwight Eisenhower is regarded as one of the most influential figures in the country’s political history. He led Allied forces in World War II, oversaw the D-Day invasion, and, as president, focused on Cold War containment, infrastructure development (Interstate Highway System), and civil rights progress. 

Stephen Covey: American educator, author, and leadership expert, most well known for his bestselling book The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. His work focused on personal development, time management, and leadership, influencing millions with principles of effectiveness, proactivity, and prioritization.

So why is the Eisenhower Matrix so popular? 

The Eisenhower Matrix can help drive efficiency and productivity across a range of professional and personal situations. This is particularly the case in high-pressure settings, such as hospitals, where heavy administrative and last-minute tasks can distract from ongoing activities. 

The Eisenhower Matrix also has two key elements that are sometimes missing from other time management tools and prioritization frameworks.

Firstly, it requires you to distinguish between what is urgent and what is important. These two terms are sometimes used synonymously, but the matrix suggests that they should be treated differently. Urgent tasks are time-sensitive. They might be simpler than important tasks, such as replying to emails or filling out forms, but we feel pressured to do these tasks first because they require us to be reactive. These are often the tasks we focus on first, even though they might not yield the most impactful results for our overall lives.5 Important tasks, such as taking on skills training or looking for a new job, are more complex and strategic tasks. They are aligned with our goals, and achieving them advances our personal or professional lives. We often put these tasks off because they require more work and even perhaps because we are afraid of failing at them. Unfortunately, procrastinating on these tasks often means that by the time we get around to them, we have less brain power and energy, and we are thus more likely to make mistakes.⁴ Decision Fatigue is the term that describes this decline in willpower and attentiveness, which characterizes our work after we’ve done a series of less important tasks before getting to the one we’ve put off.

Secondly, the Eisenhower Matrix has a ‘delete’ section. While most time management tools are all about getting everything done, the Eisenhower Matrix realizes that, in reality, the most effective way to get things done is by getting rid of unnecessary tasks. We might feel productive when we complete all tasks, but the Eisenhower Matrix forces us to ask the difficult questions: Do I actually need to do this? Is this task really going to help me attain my vision? Will this task benefit my long-term goals?⁶ However, as some have argued, the ‘delete’ function on Eisenhower’s matrix can be problematic when we’re making decisions about tasks that don’t just impact ourselves. 

This recognition that we may need to cut out elements of our schedules that feel productive but are actually wasted time can be traced back to Vilfredo Pareto and the 80/20 rule.

The Mere-Urgency Effect

In 2018, Meng Zhu, Yang Yang and Christopher Hsee designed an experiment to answer a simple question: When people are faced with choices of varying urgency and importance, how do they choose what to prioritize?⁷

Similarly to the Eisenhower Matrix, the researchers defined task importance by whether the task involves significant outcomes, and defined task urgency by a short completion window. To conceptualize the difference between the two, they used the example of scheduling a routine checkup at the doctor’s as an important task and a cancer screening after one discovers a mole as an urgent one.

The researchers wanted to see which tasks were prioritized and how the trade-offs were made. They devised a series of different experiments that forced participants to choose between tasks that would expire and give some reward (urgent) and tasks that would not expire and give a larger reward.

In the first experiment, participants were told that they could either complete Task A or Task B: both tasks required them to complete five product reviews in five minutes and both tasks would be the same level of difficulty. In the urgency condition, students were told that Task A would offer them a bonus of 6 points per review and expire in 10 minutes and Task B would offer them 10 points per review and expire in 24 hours. They were told that for every 10 points they earned, they would receive one Hershey’s Kiss. In a control condition, students were told that both Task A and Task B would have different bonus points available but that both expired after 24 hours.

The researchers found that in the control condition, only 13.3% of students chose to work on the more urgent, low-pay off task (earning them 6 points), whereas 31.3% of students in the urgency condition decided to work on the more urgent, low-pay off task. Since both tasks actually took the same amount of time and therefore the chance of completing one review in either was the same, it would have made more sense to pick the task that would offer the greatest reward and did not expire quicker. The researchers speculated that people were being influenced by the mere urgency effect, which describes people’s tendency to be influenced by the expiration of a task over its potential payoff.⁷

The researchers believed that the mere urgency effect occurred because people get enticed by restricted time frames, and that therefore, it could be diminished by shifting participants’  attention to importance instead of urgency. They devised another experiment to show this. In the new experiment, participants were asked to complete an online study for a fixed payment of 50 cents, with the possibility of either a 12 cent or 16 cent bonus depending on which task they chose. Half the workers were reminded to pay attention to the payoff of each task. The researchers found that when the payoffs were highlighted at the moment of task choice, the mere urgency effect did not come into play and workers were more likely to choose the higher paying  task.⁷ In other words, the participants understood the value of importance over urgency, but prioritized whichever one was pointed out to them.

We can think of the Eisenhower Matrix as a tool that reminds people to pay more attention to the payoff of their task by asking them to decide whether it is just urgent, or also important. It therefore can help mitigate the impacts of the mere urgency effect to ensure that we prioritize what will yield the most fruitful outcomes.

The Eisenhower Matrix in Healthcare

Radiology is a demanding field that involves reading complex medical scans and communicating with healthcare teams about diagnoses and treatments. A 2023 study found that 78% of radiologists reported reading workloads beyond their capacity, raising concerns that these high demands may be compromising patient care quality and even prompting some radiologists to change jobs or leave the profession.⁸

A group of radiologists from New York believed that the Eisenhower Matrix could help radiologists effectively manage their workload. Their paper, presented at the 2022 European Society of Radiology Congress, outlines how the tool can help radiologists achieve long-term goals and ultimately improve the success of their departments. In the context of radiology, tasks are arranged according to the following: 

• Do First (Urgent & Important) – These are high-priority tasks that need immediate attention, such as reviewing emergency CT scans ordered from other healthcare teams. 
• Schedule (Important but Not Urgent) – This includes tasks like reading routine studies, following up with doctors, or preparing for meetings.
• Delegate (Urgent but Not Important) – Tasks that need to be done quickly but don’t require the radiologist’s expertise, like administrative duties, can be assigned to others. Delegation helps maintain focus on critical work while empowering colleagues.
• Don’t Do (Not Urgent & Not Important) – These are distractions that waste time and should be avoided to stay focused on key goals. This could include browsing unrelated online content during work hours or spending too much time reorganizing workspaces. 

In other healthcare settings, the Eisenhower Matrix has been adapted more dramatically. During the early waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, antibiotic prescribing increased significantly in UK hospitals, despite COVID-19 being a viral infection that does not respond to this type of medication. A group of practitioners, led by researchers from the University of Cardiff in Wales, adapted the Eisenhower Matrix to explore and model factors affecting antibiotic prescribing in NHS hospitals during the early stages of the pandemic.¹⁰

Although they used the matrix as a foundation, they changed some elements to better reflect the complexities of clinical decision-making. First, they identified three main factors that influence antibiotic prescribing: acuity of illness (how unwell the patient is), vulnerability to infection (patient characteristics such as age, immunosuppression, and comorbidities), and likelihood of bacterial infection (based on clinical signs, lab tests, and radiology results). 

Using these factors, the researchers expanded the four-quadrant model into a more nuanced framework. The original “Urgency vs. Importance” axes were replaced with Acuity, Vulnerability, and Likelihood of Infection. They also color-coded likelihood levels to visually indicate higher or lower probabilities of prescribing antibiotics. These levels were based on various factors such as clinician experience, hospital organization, and resource availability. 

The authors provide examples of how the model can be used in real clinical contexts. In the ‘low likelihood of prescribing’ scenario, a senior clinician with more COVID-19 experience and epidemiology expertise may avoid antibiotics at all costs, unless there are very strong signs of a bacterial infection. In the ‘high likelihood of prescribing’ scenario, a junior doctor working in an overwhelmed hospital might be more likely to prescribe antibiotics simply as a precaution.

The study and the resulting model highlight the complex factors influencing antibiotic prescribing decisions. Beyond the COVID-19 pandemic context, the model may be useful for practitioners, policymakers, and healthcare professionals who are trying to overcome rising antimicrobial resistance across the globe. 

Protecting Your Projects from Cognitive Bias

Projects never go as planned. Our writer Natasha Hawryluk tackles this difficult truth and offers advice on how to  avoid delays and falling prey to the planning fallacy. As Hawryluk explores, understanding cognitive biases might help people manage their projects more effectively.

Unitasking: How to Get More Done in Less Time 

The Eisenhower Matrix is a time management strategy that advises sorting tasks into four different categories based on urgency and importance. A similar strategy, unitasking, might also be an effective way to get more done in less time. Our writer Ipsitaa Khullar outlines the science behind unitasking and explains why it might be a better strategy than multitasking.

1. Scroggs, L. (n.d.). The Eisenhower Matrix. Todoist. Retrieved February 23, 2021, from https://todoist.com/productivity-methods/eisenhower-matrix#the-mere-urgency-effect-aka-why-were-bad-at-prioritization
2. Wilson, F. (2019, March 28). What Is the Eisenhower Matrix? How to Use It to Be More Productive? nTask. https://www.ntaskmanager.com/blog/eisenhower-matrix/
3. Reeves, T. C. (1999, July 28). Dwight D. Eisenhower. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved February 23, 2021, from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Dwight-D-Eisenhower
4. Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.). Eisenhower’s Urgent/Important Principle. Mind Tools. Retrieved February 23, 2021, from https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newHTE_91.htm
5. Eisenhower Matrix: Master Productivity and Eliminate Noise. (2020, November 28). Farnam Street. Retrieved February 23, 2021, from https://fs.blog/2013/04/eisenhower-matrix/
6. Clear, J. (2020, June 9). How to be More Productive and Eliminate Time Wasting Activities by Using the “Eisenhower Box”. James Clear. https://jamesclear.com/eisenhower-box
7. Zhu, M., Yang, Y., & Hsee, C. K. (2018). The Mere Urgency effect. Oxford University Press, 45, 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy008
8. Wintermark, M. et al. (2023). Realistic productivity in academic neuroradiology: a national survey of neuroradiology division chiefs. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol., 44, 759-761
9. Zhu M. (2018, August 29). Why we procrastinate when we have long deadlines. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/08/why-we-procrastinate-when-we-have-long-deadlines. 
10. Henley, J. et al. (2023). Developing a model for decision-making around antibiotic prescribing for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in acute NHS hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative results from the Procalcitonin Evaluation of Antibiotic use in COVID-19 Hospitalised patients (PEACH Study). BMJ Open, 13. 
11. Khan, N. (2024, April 15). Prioritising the increasing taskification of general practice – the battle of the Eisenhower Matrix. BJGP Life. https://bjgplife.com/prioritising-the-increasing-taskification-of-general-practice-the-battle-of-the-eisenhower-matrix/
12. Nevins, M. (2023, January 6). How To Get Stuff Done: The Eisenhower Matrix (a.k.a. The Urgent Vs The Important). Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/hillennevins/2023/01/05/how-to-get-stuff-done-the-eisenhower-matrix-aka-the-urgent-vs-the-important/
13. Bratterud, H. et al. (2020). The Sung Diagram: Revitalizing the Eisenhower Matrix. In A-V Pietarinen et al. (Eds.), Diagrams 2020, LNAI 12169, 498-502.