• Chronic absenteeism surged during the pandemic and remains elevated, undermining academic performance, graduation rates, and student well-being as disengagement from school spills into broader social and emotional outcomes.
• Attendance improves most when it is treated as a social behavior, reinforced through belonging, peer support, positive incentives, and shared ownership rather than punishment and individual blame.
• Early, data-driven interventions work best in addressing absenteeism, as timely, personalized nudges make absence visible and help students and families course-correct before absenteeism becomes chronic.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the percentage of chronically absent K-12 students—those who miss ~10% of school days—spiked from 15% to 28%.² At the time, educational institutions attributed the trend to the challenges of remote learning. However, it was expected that numbers would bounce back post-pandemic, which has not been the case. When schools in the U.S. reopened, 31% of students were still labeled as chronically absent during the 2020-2021 school year. By 2023-2024, that number had only improved to 24%.³

Being absent from school has a host of ripple effects on students’ well-being and life outcomes. A large body of research shows that absenteeism is detrimental to academic achievement, exam results, and graduation rates, which can all have negative consequences on educational outcomes.⁴ Moreover, research shows that absenteeism leads to heightened psychological vulnerabilities⁵ and decreased social engagement.⁶ When students become disengaged from school, they become disengaged from other aspects of their lives as well. 

Currently, schools treat absenteeism as an individual matter. Attendance policies assign responsibility and trigger consequences at the individual level, such as detention or forms of disciplinary action. This assumes that students are making deliberate, rational choices to not come to school. In reality, absenteeism is often caused by socially influenced behavior, rendering individual-level interventions ineffective.

When we assume that a child decides not to come to school, we are ignoring the emotional and social factors that influence decision-making and cause it to deviate from rationality. For some students, especially those with emotional difficulties and mental health challenges, school is an immense source of stress. Strained student-teacher relationships may cause anxiety and trigger avoidance behavior. A student may be being bullied at school—physically or verbally—and fear for their safety, causing them to stay home.⁵ When a student is struggling academically, they may also retreat as a coping mechanism, as skipping school reduces their immediate emotional discomfort with failure, even if missing school has negative long-term effects on performance. This is due to present bias, where we overvalue immediate feelings over long-term consequences. Attendance policies often punish students for these behaviors, which may be justified from an emotional perspective, further exacerbating stress. Current school policies are treating symptoms, rather than the underlying causes of absenteeism. 

We must recognize that schools are social environments that play a central role in a child’s development and influence attendance. Students, especially teenagers, make decisions based on social influence. If a student feels connected to their peers, they are more motivated to attend school. If they feel isolated, attendance declines. In a post-COVID area, peer-to-peer social bonds have been strained. During remote learning, students lost connection with both their peers and their teachers, making it difficult to be motivated to regularly attend school even when doors opened back up. 

Student behavior is influenced by what they see their peers do and value, yet this is rarely leveraged in communication to students or peers as a way to attract them back to school. Research has shown that injunctive norms, such as communicating that attendance is expected, are less effective at changing behavior than descriptive norms that leverage social influence, such as “92% of your peers have a 100% attendance record.” Schools are missing opportunities to leverage peer influence and make attendance feel socially meaningful, instead placing the burden entirely on individual self-regulation. 

When schools respond with individual-level consequences, they overlook the powerful role that social connection, peer norms, and emotional safety play in shaping students’ decisions to show up. After COVID-19 disrupted routines and weakened relationships, these social drivers matter more than ever. Addressing absenteeism requires moving beyond punishment and toward approaches that rebuild belonging and make showing up feel socially expected and valued.

To combat absenteeism, we must first recognize that it is usually a symptom of a bigger problem: a lack of engagement with peers or teachers, complex emotional challenges, or already poor academic performance.

The pandemic hindered the development of social bonds and served as a catalyst for reduced attendance, positioning social-emotional learning as a key focus for addressing absenteeism. Schools should ensure that part of the curriculum includes social-emotional learning programs and anti-bullying interventions.¹ These types of programs have been shown to improve the school environment, reduce student stress, and strengthen peer and teacher relationships. A study by the Hamilton Project found that social and emotional learning helped to create a caring and supportive school climate, which in turn led to lower absentee rates.⁷ 

Another method is utilizing peer-based attendance, where students are paired into buddies or into small teams. Instead of a teacher reaching out if a student is absent, their buddy or team would check in to help strengthen peer-to-peer bonds and leverage social accountability. It also creates a sense of group identity, which influences behavior by appealing to students’ desire to remain cohesive with their group’s norms. 

A 2013 study in New York City found that chronically absent high school students paired with a success mentor— an adult or peer who checked in with them three to five days a week— were 52% more likely to remain in school the following year compared to students who did not have mentors, demonstrating the strategy’s effectiveness at reducing the risk of dropout.⁸ 

Attendance can also be made socially visible, both in the classroom and in notices to parents. For example, dashboards can be created in classrooms so students are able to see that attendance matters to their peers and activates descriptive norms. 

Shift from punishment to reward

Instead of punishing absenteeism, schools can also focus on rewarding attendance. Research has shown that positive reinforcement is more effective for habit formation than negative reinforcement, as it increases motivation and self-efficacy. If these rewards are also developed as group-based incentives, where students receive a reward for overall class attendance rather than individual attendance, then it taps into social influence, making attendance socially valuable. 

Some schools in England have moved away from solely using punitive policies, instead using a rewards-based approach where students have the chance to win prizes like bikes, iPads, chocolates, and stationery. Some have used group-based incentives, such as offering pizza parties or school trips to classrooms with strong collective attendance. A study by the National Foundation for Educational Research found that schools that combine rewards with sanctions saw higher student engagement and attendance, compared to punitive policies, such as fines, which students perceived as unfair, especially if they felt their absences were out of their control.⁹ 

Co-developing solutions with students and families 

Youth often emphasize the desire to be involved in co-developing solutions to help improve attendance.⁵ Instead of punishing absent students with detention or a letter home, teachers could request a meeting with the student and their family to identify the underlying causes behind their absenteeism and brainstorm some potential solutions with them. By showing students that teachers are invested in their well-being and perspectives, these strategies can boost self-efficacy and engagement. 

When a student is actively involved in developing solutions, they are more likely to take ownership and believe they can reach those goals. Involving the family in the conversation can also help reinforce the importance of attendance; a poll from the Centre of Social Justice found that 28% of parents believe the pandemic demonstrated that daily attendance is not essential. Parents’ engagement with schools has been correlated to better outcomes for children, including school attendance, making it vital that they are part of the conversation.¹⁰

Taken together, these approaches highlight that improving attendance requires more than enforcing rules—it requires rebuilding the social fabric of the academic environment. When students feel connected to peers and teachers, see attendance as a shared norm, and are supported rather than punished, showing up becomes easier and more meaningful.

Absence doesn’t raise alarm bells overnight. There’s one missed day here, a late arrival to class there, and before a student knows it, their absences may have snowballed—they’ve crept their way to being chronically absent. Usually, this is the point where schools step in, but it may already be too late. Humans are bad at tracking cumulative behaviors, especially if feedback is delayed. 

One of the issues is that absenteeism is difficult to accurately record. Is presence defined as students being on physical grounds each day, or making it to every class? If students are learning online, how can schools know if they are engaged with the class material or simply have their laptops open?¹ These and other questions make defining, tracking, and addressing absenteeism a complex task. 

The difficulty of answering these questions means that problems are usually missed until they become persistent. Even for schools that have established a system, many do not share long-term trends and patterns with students and families, instead focusing on daily attendance. This leads to students and families underestimating how much school has been missed.¹¹

Ten percent may not seem like a huge percentage, but it means that children are missing the equivalent of a month of learning opportunities. By the time a student has reached the level of chronic absenteeism, they may have already missed too much.¹² Early absenteeism is a strong predictor of later absenteeism, which means that schools need to intervene earlier. 

Additionally, many schools in a post-pandemic era are not taking absenteeism seriously enough. The consequences for skipping school—if it is tracked—are less severe. According to the American Enterprise Institute, if attendance were a key factor in graduation eligibility, 100,000 fewer students would have graduated in 2022. While unique challenges during the pandemic warranted loosening policies to accommodate students, school administrators need to reinforce the policies to motivate students to attend school and demonstrate to their parents that attendance is a critical part of their education.³ 

These issues point to a core behavioral failure in how absenteeism is managed: feedback arrives too late. By the time students are labeled “chronically absent,” the habit has already formed, the academic costs have compounded, and reversing the pattern becomes far more difficult. Behavioral science shows that habits are shaped through timely, clear feedback, which means institutions must develop clear, systematic, and consistent signals to help students and families become aware that they are at risk of chronic absenteeism and all the consequences that follow. 

As we’ve discussed, identifying why students are absent is an important first step in developing interventions. However, simply recording individual absences is insufficient. Schools should dedicate time to analyzing the data to reveal any hidden patterns. For example, if there is a student who often misses a particular day of the week, might there be a particular teacher or class that they are avoiding? There may be similarities between students as well—are there times in the year when attendance declines overall? By analyzing the data, combined with qualitative feedback from teachers, students, and families, institutions can identify root causes and develop corresponding interventions.¹¹ If school boards also share this data and their findings across schools, they may help other schools address attendance before it becomes a chronic issue. 

Timely, personalized nudges

Thorough attendance recording systems also let schools identify chronic absenteeism early on and develop timely, personalized nudges. After just a few absences are recorded, a student and their family should be notified, whether by text or email. When feedback is more immediate after a behavior, people are more likely to stop a habit before it is formed, making it easier to course-correct. If a student is only flagged after reaching the chronic absenteeism threshold, the amount of effort and work required to break a cemented habit and ensure they don’t miss any additional days of school can feel overwhelming. When something feels unattainable, we struggle to build the self-efficacy necessary to make meaningful changes. 

These nudges should include specific information about how many days the student has already missed, as many students are unaware of how many absences they have accumulated over time. By making absence visible in chronic terms, salience is increased, bringing potential consequences to the forefront. These communications should also reinforce the importance of attendance to make families aware that it should not be treated as optional in a post-COVID era.

In a 2017 study, researchers explored how adaptive text messaging for 26,000 elementary school students across 108 elementary schools impacted attendance. In the fall, families were randomly selected to receive “basic” messaging that talked about the importance of attendance and triggered same-day notifications if their child missed school. These basic messages either provided context on attendance benefits or attendance consequences. In the spring, the strategy was adapted to fit the behaviors of students—families whose children showed strong attendance continued to receive basic messaging, while families whose children were frequently absent received additional intensified messaging.¹³

For the intensified texts, two different approaches were tested: school staff outreach messaging or goal commitment messaging. In the school staff outreach messaging group, school staff directly texted parents instead of sending them a generic automated text. In the goal commitment messaging group, weekly texts were sent on Sundays that asked parents to set a goal for perfect attendance for the upcoming week. 

The study revealed that all four combinations of basic and intensified strategies reduced chronic absence by 2.4 - 3.6%, depending on the strategy, when compared to families that did not receive any texts. The most effective strategy in reducing absenteeism for all students was Version 1, which emphasized the benefits of attendance (positive reinforcement). There were no significant differences between the two types of adaptive messaging, demonstrating that both staff outreach messages, which demonstrate a teacher’s support and care, and goal commitment messages, which leverage the commitment bias to make people more likely to follow through on a behavior, are useful strategies. As the latter requires fewer resources, it may be a more attractive intervention for schools.¹³ 

These approaches show that attendance improves most when schools move from passive record-keeping to active, early intervention. By analyzing attendance patterns and delivering timely, personalized nudges, schools can surface problems before absenteeism becomes habitual or overwhelming. Immediate, specific, and supportive feedback— reinforced through positive framing and achievable goals—can make key differences in changing outcomes for students and families.

While this article has explored opportunities and interventions that help address overall absenteeism, we acknowledge that attendance is often shaped by structural barriers and socioeconomic factors outside institutions’ control. Low-income families may struggle more to maintain high rates of attendance as factors like housing instability, transportation access, and caregiving responsibilities can all impact students’ ability to come to school. Without parallel investments in social services and student supports, behavioral approaches risk placing responsibility back on individuals without addressing the constraints they face. However, much of the research cited showed that there were no significant associations between attendance and race, gender, or social class. 

Moreover, many schools are already understaffed and overburdened, which can make some of the interventions difficult to implement. Data analysis, timely outreach, and consistent follow-up require infrastructure, coordination, and staff buy-in. Without sustained leadership commitment and cross-school learning, even well-evidenced interventions may struggle to scale. 

Chronic absenteeism is one of the most pressing issues and barriers to student success in the post-pandemic era. However, it is too often treated as an individual failure rather than a symptom of a school environment that fails to motivate social bonds and attendance. Punitive policies, even if they are being reinforced, are doing little to combat this issue and can even worsen the problem. 

By reframing absenteeism as a symptom and developing interventions that help to identify and treat the root cause, we are more likely to see improvements. Attendance is deeply shaped by social connection and belonging, which means schools must invest time and resources into improving the school climate and creating strategies that help to make attendance socially valuable. Additionally, by incentivizing good attendance instead of punishing absence, schools can better motivate students through positive reinforcement. As absenteeism is often overlooked until it becomes chronic, at which point the student’s behavior has already become an ingrained habit, we must ensure that students and their families are receiving more immediate feedback through personalized, timely nudges to catch the issue before it snowballs. 

At The Decision Lab, we specialize in applying behavioral science to complex, system-level challenges like this one. We have significant experience in the realm of education, using behavioral science to unlock student potential. By combining rigorous evidence with practical design, we help institutions build interventions that work in real classrooms. If you’re looking to rethink attendance through a behavioral lens, we’d welcome the opportunity to collaborate.

How Might Behavioral Science Transform Education?

In this article, our senior consultants Jayden Rae and Marielle Montenegro are interviewed by our writer, Nathan Collett, about how they use behavioral science to tackle some of the biggest challenges in education reform. Education has lagged behind other sectors in using behavioral insights despite the fact that there are promising applications, ones that do not always represent a big economic burden, that can help improve the system. 

Precommitment and Procrastination: Behavioral Tools for Students

Procrastination has always been a challenge for students, but in today’s digital era, when students are distracted by a myriad of social platforms and notifications, it is easier and more tempting than ever to procrastinate. In this article, our writer Johnny Hugill explores how tools that help students make commitments and offer timely feedback can help them stick to their study schedule.

1. Whitley, J. (2024, October 22). School absenteeism in Canada: Causes, challenges, and collaborative solutions. EdCan Network. https://www.edcan.ca/articles/school-absenteeism-in-canada-causes-challenges-and-collaborative-solutions/
2. Swiderski, T., Crittenden Fuller, S., & Bastian, K. C. (2024, September 9). Student-level attendance patterns show depth, breadth, and persistence of post-pandemic absenteeism. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/student-level-attendance-patterns-show-depth-breadth-and-persistence-of-post-pandemic-absenteeism/
3. Schwalbach, J. (2025, August 27). Chronic absenteeism rates remain too high years after pandemic. Reason Foundation. https://reason.org/education-newsletter/chronic-absenteeism-rates-remain-too-high-years-after-pandemic/
4. Keppens, G. (2023). School absenteeism and academic achievement: Does the timing of the absence matter? Learning and Instruction, 86, Article 101769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101769
5. Enderle, C., Kotschy, L., Ricking, H., & Kreitz-Sandberg, S. (2025). Their voices matter: Student and professional perspectives on overcoming school attendance problems in the context of social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1627098
6. Gottfried, M. A. (2014). Chronic absenteeism and its effects on students’ academic and socioemotional outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 19(2), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.962696
7. DESSA Team. (2023, September 12). Reduce chronic absenteeism with SEL. Aperture Education. https://apertureed.com/blog/reduce-chronic-absenteeism-social-emotional-learning/
8. Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2013). Meeting the challenge of combating chronic absenteeism: Impact of the NYC Mayor’s Interagency Task Force on chronic absenteeism and school attendance and its implications for other cities (Report). Everyone Graduates Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Education. https://www.attendanceworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NYC-Chronic-Absenteeism-Impact-Report-Nov-2013-1.pdf
9. Weale, S. (2025, March 27). Pizzas, iPads and praise stamps: Pupils reap rewards for attending school. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/mar/27/ipads-pizzas-praise-stamps-pupils-rewards-boost-school-attendance
10. The Centre for Social Justice. (2025). The missing link: Restoring the bond between schools and families. The Centre for Social Justice. https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/library/the-missing-link
11. The GRAD Partnership. (2023). Proven strategies that schools can use to address chronic absenteeism: Learnings from The GRAD Partnership (Report). The GRAD Partnership. https://www.gradpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/2023_GRAD_Response-to-Chronic-Absenteeism_1-5.pdf
12. Katz, M., Adams, G., & Johnson, M. (2015). Insights into absenteeism in DCPS early childhood program: Contributing factors and promising strategies (Urban Institute Report No. 2000083). Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/39151/2000083-insights-into-absenteeism-in-dcps-early-childhood-program_0.pdf
13. Heppen, J. B., Kurki, A., & Brown, S. (2020). Can texting parents improve attendance in elementary school? A test of an adaptive messaging strategy (NCEE 2020-006). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/nces_pubs/ncee/pubs/2020006/pdf/2020006.pdf