Why is it so hard to change someone's beliefs?

Cognitive Dissonance

, explained.
Bias

What is Cognitive Dissonance?

Cognitive dissonance is the psychological discomfort we experience when we hold two or more conflicting beliefs, attitudes, or values simultaneously. To resolve this tension, we often change, justify, or ignore the conflicting information.

Cognitive Dissonance Illustration

Where this bias occurs

Consider the following hypothetical situation: John is an avid environmentalist. He is president of the environmental club at school, goes to climate change marches, and even owns an electric car.

One day, John attends a lecture on the negative environmental effects of certain food products. To his dismay, John learns that coffee processing plants are responsible for water pollution that destroys ecosystems and shrinks biodiversity. His stomach drops: this means that he is part of the problem he is trying to resolve.

This cannot be! John is an advocate for the environment… but a huge coffee drinker. Even he doesn’t think he can give up his morning brew, let alone convince his friends to do the same.

To get rid of the pit in his stomach and resolve his identity crisis, John quickly concludes that the speaker must not know what they are talking about. He also figures that even if drinking coffee isn’t great for the environment, he has made so many other efforts to be sustainable that it must even out. With his mind temporarily put at ease, John stops by Starbucks after class for his afternoon pick-me-up.

John’s refusal to stop drinking coffee is a prime example of cognitive dissonance at work. To create psychological consistency between his environmental beliefs and his not-so-environmental actions, John dismisses the lecture as misinformation so that his identity isn’t painfully compromised by an unbearable existential crisis.

Sources

  1. HARMON-JONES, E. (2002). A cognitive dissonance theory perspective on persuasion. In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice (pp. 99-116). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976046
  2. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593
  3. Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(2), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047195
  4. Knox, R. E., & Inkster, J. A. (1968). Postdecision dissonance at post time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4, Pt.1), 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025528
  5. Aronson, E., & Tavris, C. (2020, July 14). The Role of Cognitive Dissonance in the Pandemic. Retrieved July 16, 2020, from https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/07/role-cognitive-dissonance-pandemic/614074/
  6. Samson, A. (2017). The Behavioral Economics Guide 2017. Behavioral Science Solutions.
  7. Festinger, L. (1957). An Introduction to the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Retrieved June 28, 2020, from https://www.panarchy.org/festinger/dissonance.html
  8. Suls, J. (2020, May 04). Cognitive dissonance. Retrieved June 28, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leon-Festinger/Cognitive-dissonance
  9. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-conditioned-response-2794974 
  10. Ent, M. R., & Gerend, M. A. (2016). Cognitive dissonance and attitudes toward unpleasant medical screenings. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(9), 2075-2084. doi:10.1177/1359105315570986
  11. Maoz, I., Ward, A., Katz, M., & Ross, L. (2002). Reactive Devaluation of an "Israeli" vs. "Palestinian" Peace Proposal. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(4), 515-546. Retrieved July 16, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/3176189
  12. Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (n.d.). An Introduction to Cognitive Dissonance Theory and an Overview of Current Perspectives on the Theory. https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/Cognitive-Dissonance-Intro-Sample.pdf 
  13. Tikkanen, A. (n.d.). Cognitive dissonance of Leon Festinger. Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leon-Festinger/Cognitive-dissonance 
  14. Festinger and Carlsmith: Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. age-of-the-sage.org. (n.d.). https://www.age-of-the-sage.org/psychology/social/festinger_carlsmith_cognitive_dissonance.html 
  15. Forbidden Toy Experiment. Ebrary. (n.d.). https://ebrary.net/3075/management/forbidden_experiment

About the Authors

A man in a blue, striped shirt smiles while standing indoors, surrounded by green plants and modern office decor.

Dan Pilat

Dan is a Co-Founder and Managing Director at The Decision Lab. He is a bestselling author of Intention - a book he wrote with Wiley on the mindful application of behavioral science in organizations. Dan has a background in organizational decision making, with a BComm in Decision & Information Systems from McGill University. He has worked on enterprise-level behavioral architecture at TD Securities and BMO Capital Markets, where he advised management on the implementation of systems processing billions of dollars per week. Driven by an appetite for the latest in technology, Dan created a course on business intelligence and lectured at McGill University, and has applied behavioral science to topics such as augmented and virtual reality.

A smiling man stands in an office, wearing a dark blazer and black shirt, with plants and glass-walled rooms in the background.

Dr. Sekoul Krastev

Sekoul is a Co-Founder and Managing Director at The Decision Lab. He is a bestselling author of Intention - a book he wrote with Wiley on the mindful application of behavioral science in organizations. A decision scientist with a PhD in Decision Neuroscience from McGill University, Sekoul's work has been featured in peer-reviewed journals and has been presented at conferences around the world. Sekoul previously advised management on innovation and engagement strategy at The Boston Consulting Group as well as on online media strategy at Google. He has a deep interest in the applications of behavioral science to new technology and has published on these topics in places such as the Huffington Post and Strategy & Business.

About us

We are the leading applied research & innovation consultancy

Our insights are leveraged by the most ambitious organizations

Image

I was blown away with their application and translation of behavioral science into practice. They took a very complex ecosystem and created a series of interventions using an innovative mix of the latest research and creative client co-creation. I was so impressed at the final product they created, which was hugely comprehensive despite the large scope of the client being of the world's most far-reaching and best known consumer brands. I'm excited to see what we can create together in the future.

Heather McKee

BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST

GLOBAL COFFEEHOUSE CHAIN PROJECT

OUR CLIENT SUCCESS

$0M

Annual Revenue Increase

By launching a behavioral science practice at the core of the organization, we helped one of the largest insurers in North America realize $30M increase in annual revenue.

0%

Increase in Monthly Users

By redesigning North America's first national digital platform for mental health, we achieved a 52% lift in monthly users and an 83% improvement on clinical assessment.

0%

Reduction In Design Time

By designing a new process and getting buy-in from the C-Suite team, we helped one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world reduce software design time by 75%.

0%

Reduction in Client Drop-Off

By implementing targeted nudges based on proactive interventions, we reduced drop-off rates for 450,000 clients belonging to USA's oldest debt consolidation organizations by 46%

Notes illustration

Eager to learn about how behavioral science can help your organization?