Instrumental Variables Estimation

What is Instrumental Variables Estimation?

Instrumental Variables (IV) estimation is a method used in statistics and econometrics to address the problem of endogeneity, which occurs when an independent (explanatory) variable is correlated with the error term in a regression model. The approach uses instruments—variables that are correlated with the endogenous explanatory variable but uncorrelated with the error term—to obtain consistent estimates. IV estimation is particularly useful in causal inference when randomized experiments are not feasible.

The Basic Idea

Instrumental Variables (IV) estimation is a tool economists and social scientists use when they want to deduce a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables—specifically when there's a problem, and hidden factors are messing with results. 

Imagine you're trying to see how pet ownership affects people’s long-term health. The challenge is that factors like income level or personality traits, for example, could influence both an individual’s likelihood to adopt a pet and their long-term health. This creates a problem because these hidden factors make it difficult to know whether it’s actually the pet ownership that’s affecting health, or if baseline health and wealth impact whether someone is more likely to own a pet in the first place. 

That’s where IV estimation comes into play. Instead of directly trying to link pet ownership to health, researchers use an ‘instrument’—a third variable that’s related to pet ownership but doesn’t directly affect health. The key is finding something that influences whether someone adopts a pet, without being influenced by the same hidden factors.

For example, one potential instrument could be the presence of pet adoption campaigns in a specific neighborhood. A greater number of pet adoption advertisements won’t have an impact on the health of the people in the area, but it would likely increase someone’s willingness to adopt. Using this outside variable of adoption campaigns as an instrument helps to isolate the effect of pet adoption on health, stripping away the noise from the hidden factors. 

In more technical terms, the number of pet adoption campaigns is considered an exogenous variable because it’s unrelated to the health outcomes of people in the area (they influence pet adoption rates but don't directly affect health). On the other hand, if we tried to use something like income as a predictor of pet adoption, we might face endogeneity because income could also influence health outcomes, creating a correlation with both adoption and health which leads to biased results. 

To recap, the instrumental variable (the adoption campaigns) helps overcome this bias by isolating the effect of pet adoption on health. Thus, exogeneity ensures the variable only impacts the predictor (adoption rates) and not the outcome (health) and endogeneity occurs when a variable impacts both, confounding the analysis.

About the Author

A smiling woman with long blonde hair is standing, wearing a dark button-up shirt, set against a backdrop of green foliage and a brick wall.

Annika Steele

Annika completed her Masters at the London School of Economics in an interdisciplinary program combining behavioral science, behavioral economics, social psychology, and sustainability. Professionally, she’s applied data-driven insights in project management, consulting, data analytics, and policy proposal. Passionate about the power of psychology to influence an array of social systems, her research has looked at reproductive health, animal welfare, and perfectionism in female distance runners.

About us

We are the leading applied research & innovation consultancy

Our insights are leveraged by the most ambitious organizations

Image

I was blown away with their application and translation of behavioral science into practice. They took a very complex ecosystem and created a series of interventions using an innovative mix of the latest research and creative client co-creation. I was so impressed at the final product they created, which was hugely comprehensive despite the large scope of the client being of the world's most far-reaching and best known consumer brands. I'm excited to see what we can create together in the future.

Heather McKee

BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST

GLOBAL COFFEEHOUSE CHAIN PROJECT

OUR CLIENT SUCCESS

$0M

Annual Revenue Increase

By launching a behavioral science practice at the core of the organization, we helped one of the largest insurers in North America realize $30M increase in annual revenue.

0%

Increase in Monthly Users

By redesigning North America's first national digital platform for mental health, we achieved a 52% lift in monthly users and an 83% improvement on clinical assessment.

0%

Reduction In Design Time

By designing a new process and getting buy-in from the C-Suite team, we helped one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world reduce software design time by 75%.

0%

Reduction in Client Drop-Off

By implementing targeted nudges based on proactive interventions, we reduced drop-off rates for 450,000 clients belonging to USA's oldest debt consolidation organizations by 46%

Read Next

Notes illustration

Eager to learn about how behavioral science can help your organization?