The world is vast and complex and it may sometimes seem that our small decisions and actions have little to no impact on the big picture. However, if you think about minute details of your life, you may be able to see how a small event was actually the catalyst for a huge change in your life. For example, maybe you bumped into someone at a coffee shop that happens to work at your dream company and eventually got you an interview there. What if you had chosen a different coffee shop, or been there five minutes later? You may not have met the person that got you into your dream job. The idea that something small, like getting coffee, can have much larger effects, such as altering your career is called the butterfly effect.

The butterfly effect is a property of our incredibly complex, deeply interconnected world, such that one small occurrence can influence a much larger complex system. The effect is named after an allegory in chaos theory; it evokes the idea that a small butterfly flapping its wings could, hypothetically, cause a typhoon. Or it could not – the mind-boggling part of the butterfly effect is that it’s virtually impossible to predict whether a small system will lead to chaotic behavior.¹

While the butterfly effect has taken up an altered definition in popular media and everyday use, a more accurate version explains that small changes in one part of an interconnected system can cause disproportionately large outcomes elsewhere, setting off a chain of events that can lead to unpredictable results. Originating in the complex field of weather modeling, the butterfly metaphor was initially used to illustrate how seemingly inconsequential changes in the starting conditions of a weather model could result in significant differences in outcome. This realization underscored the difficulty of making predictions in complex systems like weather.

Today, the butterfly effect is widely referenced outside the context of weather science. It is now used more broadly to refer to situations where small changes cause large consequences. The effect has been applied to economics, environmental science, and even mental health—though it's sometimes incorrectly used to state that small changes can lead to predictable consequences (similar to the coffee shop example provided above). While people often misinterpret the original meaning of the butterfly effect, popular culture has largely embraced the metaphor to explain the powerful interconnectedness of life on Earth.

Chaos Theory: A branch of mathematics dedicated to studying apparently unpredictable systems that are governed by deterministic laws, meaning they follow specific patterns or rules of nature.⁴ The idea is that these complex systems, despite following fixed rules, appear to behave randomly because they are sensitive to very small changes in their initial conditions. As a result, it is largely impossible to make long-term predictions with absolute certainty.

Determinism: The idea that all events are inevitable and causally determined by previous events and conditions.⁵ The butterfly effect describes how small changes can result in unpredictable consequences over a period of time, even in deterministic systems where every event is theoretically pre-determined by what happened before.

Nonlinearity: A property of systems that cannot be expressed with a straight line.15 In nonlinear systems, outputs are not directly proportional to inputs, so a change in input does not result in a predictable change in output. The butterfly effect illustrates how small changes in input can lead to disproportionate changes in output, making the behavior of nonlinear systems very difficult—if not impossible—to predict.

Feedback Loops: A property of complex systems in which outcomes are fed back into the system, amplifying or dampening the disproportionate impact of small changes on eventual outcomes. Because of these feedback loops, the butterfly effect can cascade into exponential or runaway effects. For example, a ball rolling down a hill might hit a bump that changes its course toward a steeper part of the hill, which causes it to roll faster, diverting its course even more significantly. These feedback loops make it very challenging to predict exactly where the ball will end up when you release it at the top of the hill.16

Black Swan: The butterfly effect is related to another phenomenon, the black swan. Black swans are events that are ‘outliers’, seemingly random but with life-changing impact on our world. The key understanding of black swans, similar to the butterfly effect, is that it is impossible to predict these events, even though they are ultimately consequential.

The earliest utterances relating to the butterfly effect seem to have come from the historical proverb “For Want of a Nail,” first recorded by the 13th-century didactic poet Freidank. Hundreds of years later, Benjamin Franklin popularized a rhyming version of the proverb in his book Poor Richard’s Almanack (1732) to communicate the idea that small things can have significant effects on larger consequences:¹⁴

“For want of a nail the shoe was lost,

For want of a shoe the horse was lost,

For want of a horse the rider was lost,

For want of a rider the battle was lost,

For want of a battle the kingdom was lost,

And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.” ¹

This proverb illustrates the fundamental idea of the butterfly effect: that seemingly inconsequential events could set off a chain of events with unpredictable consequences. Missing a single nail in a horseshoe might not change anything, but it could also indirectly result in the fall of an entire kingdom. Either way, it would be impossible to predict that this specific series of events would lead to such an outcome.

Although ideas similar to the concept may have been circulating for centuries, the butterfly effect was first named by meteorologist and mathematician Edward Lorenz. In the 1960s, Lorenz worked in the MIT Department of Meteorology using simple computer models to simulate weather patterns.¹⁷ At the time, weather was mostly predicted using linear models, but Lorenz was interested in an emerging school of dynamic meteorology that acknowledged that weather patterns were much more complex than originally thought.

In his search for ways to accurately predict the weather, Lorenz found that mathematical linear models did not provide accurate predictions.¹ Just as it would be almost impossible to predict that you would land your dream job by deciding to get coffee, Lorenz found that initial weather conditions were not sufficient indicators of future weather conditions.

At one point, while running his weather simulations, Lorenz decided to rerun a computation to examine it more closely. He manually entered a line of numbers that the computer had printed earlier but rounded off the values to the third decimal place, suspecting that such a minuscule change wouldn’t matter at all.¹⁷ However, he was surprised to find that the results from the repeated simulation were entirely different from the previous one. Lorenz initially thought a computer error caused this but decided to look more closely at the numbers before calling for technical assistance. He found that while the numbers from the second simulation matched the original data at first, the differences increased significantly over time until the final results no longer resembled the original simulation at all.

Lorenz realized that small changes in initial conditions—like changing an initial atmospheric condition by 0.000127—could lead to drastically different weather outcomes. Such a small, seemingly insignificant change caused his model to predict very different future weather conditions.1 He realized that minuscule changes in a starting condition could mean an enormous difference in later events: tiny changes in the atmosphere could change the entire course of the weather, making it nearly impossible to predict.

In 1963, Lorenz published a paper with these ideas titled Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow. In this paper, he essentially argued that weather predictions are inaccurate not only because knowing the precise starting conditions is impossible but a tiny degree of change can significantly throw off the results.¹

The paper was scientific and jargon-heavy, which led Lorenz to start using a more palatable concept during talks and interviews: the poetic “butterfly effect”. He likened his findings to the idea that a butterfly’s wing flapping represents the tiny change in atmospheric condition that would have the potential to alter the trajectory of a tornado. He stressed that such a perturbation didn’t necessarily have to change the course of events, but that it could, and that there was essentially no way of knowing what caused changes in weather. This is key to the butterfly effect: we can’t predict exactly what will tip a system, and the innocuous butterfly is a symbol of this unknown factor. Lorenz, therefore, advocated for deterministic chaos models that account for the exponential growth of errors.¹

Chaos Theory

Lorenz’s discovery of the butterfly effect played a role in advancing chaos theory, illuminating the significant limitations we’re up against when making predictions in complex, nonlinear systems. The central idea of chaos theory is that deterministic systems can be extremely sensitive to initial conditions.² Small differences in starting conditions can, over time, make a big difference in how a complex system of interrelated phenomena evolves.³ Not only that, but some systems have feedback loops, which means that small differences could be incorporated back within the system, and there is no telling what will later be affected—it is out of our control. 

Chaos theory is specifically interested in studying random or unpredictable behavior, even in systems that are supposed to be governed by deterministic laws.⁴ Deterministic laws are supposed to remove any randomness, as determinism, in a philosophical sense, is the idea that previously existing causes completely determine all events.⁵ Importantly, the butterfly effect does not reject the idea of deterministic systems. It occurs within these systems, suggesting that there are non-linear ways in which small differences can change outcomes even when systems follow predictable rules.

Edward Lorenz

Meteorologist and mathematician who recognized and popularized the concept of the butterfly effect. Although ideas similar to the butterfly effect have been in circulation for a very long time, Edward Lorenz was the first to put these thoughts into a publishable paper and the first to liken the concept to a butterfly flapping its wings. It is thanks to Lorenz that the concept is deeply embedded within popular culture. His metaphor allowed the concept to be taken out of purely scientific discourse and be understood by the general public.

James Gleick

Author and science historian recognized as one of the greatest science writers of all time. He popularized Lorenz’s ideas about the butterfly effect in his book, Chaos: Making a New Science.⁶ In the book, Gleick challenged the prior scientific theory that assumed that insights into the initial conditions of things were an accurate and reliable predictor of future conditions. He argued that traditional linear models failed to account for the chaotic nature of complex systems and shared Lorenz’s demonstrations on the potential impact of differences in initial conditions on ultimate outcomes.

Ray Bradbury

Often, the term the butterfly effect conjures up Ray Bradbury’s short story, A Sound of Thunder, which was actually published in 1952, before Lorenz’s paper. The protagonist in the novel, Eckels, travels back in time to hunt a dinosaur but inadvertently steps on a butterfly. When he returns to the present day, the world as he knew it has completely transformed.⁷ A small change in initial conditions altered the world that Eckels once knew, a tale that has now come to be associated with the butterfly effect.

Eric Bress & J. Mackye Gruber

It is almost impossible to talk about the butterfly effect without discussing the 2004 movie of the same name, directed by Bress and Gruber. Starring Ashton Kutcher, Amy Smart, and Eric Stoltz, the movie applies the butterfly effect theory to the lives of four children, examining how small actions that occur during time travel alter the course of each character.⁸

The butterfly is literally all about consequences. It describes how very small things can have great impacts, which means that we can’t just ignore the little things. Even the identification of the butterfly effect had significant impacts on how scientists and economists understood the world.

Making scientific predictions

When Lorenz discussed his findings, it had a significant impact on the way people understood scientific predictions. Up until this point, science had used linear, deterministic models that assumed that it was easy to trace the path between a cause, A and an effect, B.

There was a generally held belief that scientists need not worry about minute details external to the phenomenon that was being studied, because it would have no impact on the relationship between A and B. The butterfly effect demonstrated that causes and effects do not have a purely linear relationship and do not exist independently to other things happening externally, making it difficult to accurately make predictions.

This discovery changed how scientists approached predictions, especially in fields like meteorology. For instance, the challenge of making accurate predictions in light of the butterfly effect prompted the development of ensemble forecasting, which involves running weather simulations over and over with slightly different initial conditions.¹⁸ The idea with these models is to predict a range of potential weather conditions, producing an ensemble of forecasts so meteorologists can determine how likely a particular weather event might be.

Business and marketing

But the butterfly effect has consequences that fall outside of science as well. The butterfly effect is widely studied in business because it highlights how small initial actions can yield great rewards in the future.⁹ This suggests significant insights for marketing. For instance, small, simple actions could become a catalyst for attracting lots of customers, ultimately allowing a business to become more successful. However, the butterfly effect also demonstrates the challenge of predicting and shaping these outcomes. Like the weather, marketing is a complex system with outcomes that can be incredibly difficult to predict, and determining the direct impact of any single, minuscule marketing move is next to impossible.¹⁹

The butterfly effect more accurately captures the complex market that we operate in. Marketplaces are complex systems with many interconnected pieces, especially in today’s modern world. Whether a business fails or succeeds may be attributed to very small details in its strategy.

Physician Dr. Rajagopal writes about the butterfly effect in competitive markets in his 2015 book.10 In the book, Dr. Rajagopal explains how successful businesses like Apple and Nestlé often approach the competitive market by introducing small changes that have a major effect on the market.¹ For example, think about the fact that Apple often only introduces small technological upgrades between their iPhone models, but still, each time they release a new model, the devices often fly off the shelves. Since it is difficult for businesses to accurately predict how they will fare in a competitive market, it is a better idea to focus on small, controllable details.

Climate change and individual responsibility

With its focus on interconnectivity, the butterfly effect also indicates that the actions of an individual can have far-reaching ramifications for a wider population. It challenges the idea that our individual actions have no broader impact. Just think about how much a political leader’s actions impact the state of the world. Now consider that your own actions might also have unpredictable and far-reaching consequences.

The butterfly effect asks us to be thoughtful with our decisions because we never know what the consequences of those decisions are. It can also be incredibly motivating, as it suggests that our actions DO matter in altering the trajectory of the world, no matter how small they might be. Such information is important when it comes to issues like climate change because people often believe that their individual actions will not have a big enough impact on carbon emissions and the resulting environmental challenges. 

The butterfly effect suggests that while a small action, like choosing to use a reusable straw, may not have a linear effect on carbon emissions, it could still alter the trajectory of climate change in some way. This perspective can encourage us all to live our lives more mindful of our potential impact on society as a whole.

The butterfly effect in popular culture

The butterfly effect has become a powerful metaphor in pop culture, often appearing in films, books, TV shows, and video games. Most modern references position the effect as a cautionary tale about the potentially disastrous impacts of small actions. In the 1990 movie Havana, the main character alludes to the effect when he says that “a butterfly can flutter its wings over a flower in China and cause a hurricane in the Caribbean,” using the concept as a metaphor for the significance of small actions.²⁰ However, he wrongly suggests that scientists can calculate the odds of such things occurring.

While the butterfly effect shows up in all kinds of media, the 2004 movie The Butterfly Effect—described by some critics as a “tasteless thriller”—is largely responsible for popularizing the concept. The movie combines the concept with basic time travel mechanics, allowing the main character to travel back in time to make tiny changes that drastically alter the present. 

Both films mentioned above appear to mischaracterize the butterfly effect by suggesting that it can be predicted, calculated, and controlled. This is common in media portrayals of the effect, where the concept is often used more as a metaphor rather than an accurate scientific explanation. Even though many pop culture references to the butterfly effect take liberty with the concept and apply it more broadly, its influence can be seen across several works of fiction and continues to fascinate and inspire to this day.

While the butterfly effect is widely referenced in both scientific contexts and popular media, it has sparked several debates over its interpretations and implications. 

Misinterpretations of the butterfly effect

It is sometimes debated whether the popular understanding of the butterfly effect is accurate. When people use the term, they often refer to the idea that small things inherently lead to big consequences, but this interpretation diverges slightly from Lorenz’s original concept—that complex systems are unpredictable because they are extremely sensitive to changes in initial conditions.

In popular discourse, the butterfly effect is often akin to the idea of leverage or the idea that we can manipulate small things to achieve a desired end.¹ The book Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World, describes this likening as a mistake, suggesting that the butterfly effect does not describe the ability for a small thing to be leveraged to manipulate greater effects.¹¹ This is because a key point of Lorenz’s theory is that things cannot be predicted by their initial conditions. Although small things can have a large impact, it is difficult, if not impossible, to accurately predict the relationship between small actions and effects. As we have mentioned, the butterfly effect does not mean that small things will necessarily lead to large consequences but that they equally could or could not. Chaos cannot be predicted, which means the butterfly effect should not mean that we should understand small actions as tools for manipulating outcomes.¹

The butterfly effect and traditional economics

The butterfly effect also doesn’t spell out good news for many economic models. Economic models are often predicated on the idea that consumers have stable, well-defined preferences, which makes their behavior easy to predict. However, if the butterfly effect is true, then it suggests that not only are these models false but perhaps no universal predictions of human behavior are possible. Although dismissing the idea of predictions altogether may be drastic, the butterfly effect at least demonstrates that we cannot trace linear relationships between causes and effects and that economic models may need to be reconfigured to incorporate a certain level of uncertainty.

Can a butterfly really cause a tornado?

Now, here’s the real question: can a distant butterfly really cause a tornado in another part of the world? To address this controversy, it’s important to note that there are two kinds of butterfly effects. The first, known as the sensitive dependence on initial conditions (SDIC), refers to Lorenz’s original findings that small initial changes can lead to significant differences in chaotic systems—this classical butterfly effect is widely recognized and has been demonstrated time and time again by modeling tools.

Debates on butterfly effects mostly center around the second type: the ability of a small perturbation (like the flap of a butterfly’s wing) to have large, far-reaching consequences (like a tornado). In reality, studies suggest that this phenomenon is unlikely to occur in the real atmosphere. According to researchers Bo-Wen Shen, Roger Pielke Sr., and Xubin Zeng, the tiny air disturbances caused by a butterfly’s wings are simply too small to have any impact on large-scale atmospheric conditions.²¹

Disease in an Interconnected World

COVID-19 is a good example of how a small incident can have a disastrous impact on the entire world. There has been speculation that a pandemic was inevitable, given the interconnected state of our globalized world, where it is impossible to stop something happening in one country to spread to other nations. Navindu Katugampola, a financial investor, describes the way that COVID-19 has evolved as an example of the butterfly effect.¹² It began in a food market in China and today, has touched almost every single city in the world. A small incident has had non-linear, but massive, impacts on the world and society, with the consequences exacerbated because we are so connected.

Additionally, COVID-19 shows how different sectors are all part of a complex system and therefore, how when there is a change in one sector, like health, other sectors like finance, mental health, or the environment are also impacted.

Small Actions and Climate Change

As was earlier speculated, the butterfly effect can demonstrate how small, individual acts can help contribute to the state of our earth. There seems to be little agreement on what will happen to planet Earth as a result of human activity, but it is generally accepted that our activity has had drastic impacts on our environment and that habitats have changed as a result. Earth is one massive, complex ecosystem, but it is important that we realize that one generation’s collective actions can have incredibly powerful (and scary) consequences on the system, an idea that stems from the butterfly effect.¹³ Even though we may not be able to accurately predict exactly what will happen if we continue the way that we are, as the butterfly effect does not pretend to be able to trace how small actions have larger effects, it does demonstrate that what we do matters. Instead of believing that we are doomed and there is no way for our individual actions to change the trajectory of climate change, the butterfly effect suggests that our small actions could quite strikingly alter the route that we’re on.

Nassim Taleb

If you were interested in the ways in which the butterfly effect is similar to the idea of black swans, then you should read our thinker profile on Nassim Taleb, the man who wrote a famous book entitled Black Swans. In the piece, we explicate how Taleb’s line of thinking concludes that the world is random and unpredictable, but that there is strength to be found within this uncertainty.

The Consumer Upside of an Economic Downturn 

As has been mentioned, COVID-19 is a great example of the butterfly effect. Although it may be easy to trace relationships between things like COVID-19 and the economy, this article explores how COVID-19 has also led to economic behavior that would be hard to trace linearly, or hard to predict.

1. Farnam Street. (2019, November 27). The butterfly effect: Everything you need to know about this powerful mental model. https://fs.blog/2017/08/the-butterfly-effect/
2. Halpern, P. (2018, February 14). Chaos theory, the butterfly effect, and the computer glitch that started it all. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/02/13/chaos-theory-the-butterfly-effect-and-the-computer-glitch-that-started-it-all/#1c89e3f269f6
3. Davey, B. (2011, October 6). Economics is not a social science. Resilience. https://www.resilience.org/stories/2011-10-07/economics-not-social-science/
4. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2007, November 30). Chaos theory. Retrieved October 23, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/science/chaos-theory
5. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2009, February 18). Determinism. Retrieved October 23, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/determinism
6. Flam, F. (2012, June 15). The Physics of Ray Bradbury’s “A Sound of Thunder”. The Philadelphia Inquierer. https://www.inquirer.com/philly/blogs/evolution/Time-and-The-Physics-of-Ray-Bradbury
7. Deaton, J. (2020, February 2). The butterfly effect is not what you think it is. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/02/02/butterfly-effect-is-not-what-you-think-it-is/
8. Ebert, R. (n.d.). The butterfly effect movie review (2004). Movie reviews and ratings by Film Critic Roger Ebert | Roger Ebert. Retrieved October 23, 2020, from https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-butterfly-effect-2004
9. Dowell, D. (n.d.). Butterfly Effect in Business. Small Business. Retrieved October 23, 2020, from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/butterfly-effect-business-23172.html
10. Rajagopal. (2015). The butterfly effect in competitive markets: Driving small changes for large differences. Springer.
11. Goodreads. (n.d.). Butterfly effect quotes. Retrieved October 23, 2020, from https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/butterfly-effect
12. Katugampola, N. (2020). The Butterfly Effect & COVID-19: Six Implications for Sustainable Investing in an Interconnected World. Morgan Stanley. https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_thebutterflyeffect_us.pdf
13. Clark, B. (2007, October 15). The butterfly effect and the environment: How tiny actions can save the world. Copyblogger. https://copyblogger.com/butterfly-effect-environment/
14. Efe, B. (2022, December 15). For want of a nail printable lyrics, origins, and video. Playtivities. https://playtivities.com/for-want-of-a-nail/
15. Corporate Finance Institute. (n.d.). Nonlinearity. Corporate Finance Institute. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/data-science/nonlinearity/ 
16. Second Quadrant Living (2023, May 23). Unseen connections: The butterfly effect, chaos theory, and our interconnected world. Medium. https://secondquadrantliving.medium.com/unseen-connections-the-butterfly-effect-chaos-theory-and-our-interconnected-world-dc9bc02b8743 
17. Motter, A. E., & Campbell, D. K. (2013). Chaos at fifty. Physics Today, 66(5), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1986 
18. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022, May 25). What does the butterfly effect have to do with weather forecasts? Based on Science. https://www.nationalacademies.org/based-on-science/what-does-the-butterfly-effect-have-to-do-with-weather-forecasts 
19. Schaub, K. (2021, June 23). The butterfly effect: What non-linearity means for marketing and the human-machine dynamic. Kathleen Schaub. https://www.kathleenschaub.com/blog/butterfly-effect-non-linearity-marketing-human-machine 
20. Fandom. (n.d.). Butterfly effect in popular culture. Cultural Phenomenons Wiki. Retrieved December 23, 2024, from https://cultural-phenomenons.fandom.com/wiki/Butterfly_effect_in_popular_culture  
21. Shen, B.-W., Pielke, R., & Zeng, X. (2024). A summary of two kinds of butterfly effects. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32401.24163