Digital Literacy

Sam scrolls through their feed on the way to school: one post says climate change is a hoax, and the next tells them their data has been stolen. Another promises a get-rich-quick crypto scheme. Out of curiosity, Sam clicks on the crypto link, only to end up deep into a fringe, echo-chamber ridden forum where there are mismatches between confidence and credibility. Just being able to navigate digital platforms doesn’t mean knowing how to think critically online. This isn’t just a research failure for Sam. It’s a digital literacy problem.

Digital literacy is increasingly recognized as a foundational skill that may be just as essential as reading or numeracy. According to UNESCO, it’s “the ability to access, manage, understand, integrate, communicate, evaluate and create information safely and appropriately through digital technologies.”¹ It’s about how we interact with technology, not just whether we're able to or not. Some frameworks highlight the need for students to use digital tools to work on problems, finish tasks, and create new content.² In this sense, digital literacy is less about the tools themselves and more about their thoughtful application in our omnipresent online world.

One way we can reflect on our own digital literacy is by considering our multiple digital selves.³ We all use different technologies, from an iPad to Alexa, from Google Maps to ChatGPT, and numerous platforms and devices in between. Our digital selves are both distinct and interconnected across contexts, between your personal life, in the workplace, and when you learn something new. We can see the overlap and independence of digital selves as follows:

It's not all about the digital: Four types of literacy in online worlds

Let’s rewind to the 1960s when computers were first introduced to education, and we can trace the roots of four primary concepts that have since continuously spread in the literature. Alongside digital literacy, other types of literacies remain relevant to online domains: information, media, and computer literacy. These literacies are not mutually exclusive; in fact, they are complementary as skillsets of how we consume data in the 21st century:³

Digital literacy in practice

What do digital literacy skills look like out in the world? It can be challenging to keep up with the latest technologies during a time of rapid online acceleration, especially with more recent technology such as ChatGPT and countless other iterations of AI-powered tools. Let’s break this down for the digitally literate learner:¹

Online decisions in a clickbait world

Sam didn’t mean to spread misinformation, yet without digital literacy, Sam was missing the critical lens required to question what he found, or how he even found it in the first place. Digital literacy enables learners to use technology in ways that are purposeful and discerning, not merely convenient.³ But what happens when digital literacy is lacking? 

Here, we are at risk of being enticed by alluring hooks and clickbait headlines in a digital landscape where engagement is prioritized over truth. Algorithms are designed to keep us hooked, not necessarily informed. Without the skills to question what we see online, misinformation can spread rapidly, and people can be manipulated with subtle nudges. Research shows that digital illiteracy fuels polarization and erodes trust in democratic institutions.⁴ In this type of treacherous online environment, being digitally literate means being able to recognize emotional appeals, being aware of your algorithmic bias, and knowing when a source isn’t credible.

For learners of all ages, digital literacy is a bridge to information and participation alike in today’s world. It enables us to think critically and communicate effectively online while keeping ethics in mind. It is digital literacy that empowers people to navigate daily life in the modern age with confidence, from applying for jobs to accessing healthcare.⁵ For a kid like Sam, this means more than avoiding scams or spotting fake news; it’s about learning to express themselves confidently and protect their own privacy. In other words, digital literacy is a key function in preparing for what we have come to know as digital citizenship in today’s online age.

Misinformation: False or misleading information spread online, whether intentionally or not. A viral post claiming drinking salt water cures COVID-19 is a classic example of misinformation, and being able to spot it requires digital literacy.

Clickbait: Content designed to grab attention and provoke clicks by exaggerating or misleading, like a thumbnail saying “You won’t believe what happened next!” on your favourite YouTuber’s new video. Digital literacy teaches us to look beyond catchy titles to uncover the real story.

Nudges: Subtle design choices that guide how we interact online without limiting our options. For instance, a responsible social media platform might highlight reliable news sources above sensational stories to nudge users toward accurate information.

Algorithmic Bias: The way algorithms filter and personalize the content we see, often amplifying certain views or stereotypes. If your TikTok feed repeatedly shows extreme political opinions, digital literacy means recognizing the algorithm’s role in shaping your perspective.

Digital Citizenship: The responsible and ethical use of digital technologies. This may include how we engage with information or protect our privacy online. At its core, it’s about cultivating the critical thinking and empathy needed to navigate the digital world in ways that are equally as safe as they are socially conscious.

Data Privacy: Knowing how personal information is collected, used, and protected online. For example, understanding what data a fitness app accesses and deciding what to share is part of digital literacy.

Digital Divide: The gap between those who have access to digital tools and skills and those who don’t. A rural community struggling with slow internet speeds while schools shift to online learning is a real-world example of the digital divide.

For most of human history, literacy was defined as the ability to read and write words on paper. Yet with the rise of digital technologies in the late 20th century, those traditional skills no longer told the whole story. In the transition from simple alphabets to complex algorithms, educators and scholars began to realize that navigating an increasingly digital world required a different kind of fluency—one that included screens, hyperlinks, and interactivity.^6,7

The earliest roots of digital literacy can be traced to the 1990s, when the term computer literacy emerged from thinkers such as Paul Gilster in 1997. It might be hard for kids today to imagine how simple it once was: others like Doug Belshaw put an emphasis on teaching people how to operate a computer with skills such as using a keyboard, saving a file, and understanding basic coding.⁶ Just like your favorite typing game in elementary school, digital literacy began as a functional, technical skillset for everyday use. Nowadays, it presents as a broader, critical thinking-oriented point of view that we now associate with this concept.

As the internet became mainstream in the 2000s, digital tools started to shape a whole lot more than just work itself. The influence of the digital world spanned from how we learn and communicate with each other to how we participate in society at large. Scholars pushed for a more comprehensive understanding of literacy in this new, ubiquitous context where critical thinking and creativity were a must, along with ethics.⁸ At this time, digital literacy was no longer niche: it was evolving to be viewed as an essential life skill.

By the 2010s, the focus expanded again to include concepts like digital citizenship and data privacy. Our public identity becomes a digital footprint that is seemingly inerasable, yet also constantly at risk at the hands of hackers and others alike (not just because you only use one password). These revelations emerged in tandem with the advocacy for the necessary ability to evaluate online information, especially in light of rising misinformation and algorithmic influence.^3,9 Educators and researchers began viewing digital literacy as a civic competency: the ability to participate safely and effectively in digital public life.

Today, digital literacy continues to evolve alongside the digital divide. While we cite worries over critical thinking skills with generative AI, kids are surfing a new wave of digital literacy with AI in their back pockets. As digital platforms become more immersive and AI-powered, the definition of digital literacy must keep up the pace—if it can. Where digital literacy goes next will be far beyond mere survival in a hyper-connected world, as it promises to be as thrilling as it is unsettling. 

Doug Belshaw

A leading voice in the field, Belshaw helped broaden the concept of digital literacy beyond basic tech skills. His influential Elements of Digital Literacies framework argues that digital literacy is not one thing, but a constellation of skills—including cultural, cognitive, and critical dimensions.

Paul Gilster

Often credited with coining the term digital literacy in the 1990s, Gilster emphasized critical thinking over technical know-how. In his foundational book Digital Literacy (1997), he framed it as the ability to understand and evaluate digital information, not just access it.

Digital literacy is more than optimal learning in digital times— it comes with benefits for career development, improves health outcomes, and strengthens the critical thinking that everyone seems to be fretting over these days. 

Workforce readiness for career growth

Being job-ready today means being digitally fluent. As automation accelerates across industries, digital literacy has become essential for navigating shifting tools and technologies. Research shows that workers who can evaluate online information and adapt to new platforms in virtual teams are better equipped to solve problems and make informed decisions.¹⁰ For employers, digitally literate teams are as productive as they are agile. When employees can troubleshoot digital issues while protecting data as they apply technology in creative ways, organization-wide resilience occurs in the face of change.

Digital literacy fosters more specific workplace competencies like confidence and inclusion, too. Spanning from entry-level roles to leadership positions, those with strong digital skills are more likely to embrace innovation and keep up with evolving demands. This is especially important in multigenerational teams, where technology gaps can hinder communication and collaboration—a challenge that has caused us all frustrations at some point, irrespective of our age and tech-savviness. Digital literacy closes these divides while empowering workers to contribute meaningfully as competitive candidates in a job market where nearly 85% of roles in Canada currently require computer use.¹⁰ Digital literacy isn’t a mere nice-to-have; it’s an essential pathway to sustainable employment.

Potential for better health outcomes

Digital literacy goes beyond what you see and click on your smartphone, where tangible effects can be seen with real health outcomes. This becomes challenging when digital health services themselves, with their inherent need to be digitally literate to an extent, have a range of variation in how much the user needs to input. In understanding this, we can say that a wearable smartwatch doesn’t take much effort if you go on a run, but accessing a telemedicine service can be a headache for anyone.¹¹ As these digital health services aren’t going anywhere, the ability for the lay public to use them becomes increasingly complex.

It is for the nuance of navigating such services that digital literacy may be thought of as a contemporary determinant of health. In a scoping review of about 50 carefully selected articles some researchers described digital health literacy as the ability to locate and apply health information with the desire to resolve a health issue using technology as a key term in this context.¹² That being said, it seems that the digital divide is even more crucial than simply being tech-savvy—it can be the difference between poor health outcomes and equity for different populations seeking to become digitally literate. 

Critical thinking in the information age

In an era flooded with information overload, critical thinking is essential for navigating the digital world. It helps individuals assess the credibility of information while looking for biases—and hopefully steers us clear of falling for misinformation. Research tells us that these skills are key to informed decisions surrounding academic success and meaningful online engagement.¹³ As digital spaces grow more complex, critical thinking acts like a compass: guiding users to make thoughtful, evidence-based choices rather than reacting impulsively to headlines or viral content.

In this same context, critical thinking supports digital responsibility, which is where our ethical use of technology and information comes in. When there is time to slow down and evaluate, users are more likely to avoid plagiarism and verify sources before sharing. This awareness has other important effects, like reducing cyberbullying and misinformation while encouraging safe, constructive interactions online instead of negative ones.¹³ Pairing critical thinking with digital literacy enables students and professionals alike to be equally as technology-informed as they are empowered digital citizens.

Digital literacy isn’t flawless. We are all well-aware of how unreliable (and now AI-slop-ridden) online content can be. Let’s investigate how digital literacy doesn’t guarantee filtering misinformation, how gaps in technology remain, and the cognitive overload of online realms. 

Misinformation spreads, even when we know better

While digital literacy improves people’s ability to spot misinformation, it doesn’t always necessarily change their behavior, and many still share it anyway.¹⁴ One major challenge is the disconnect between knowing and doing: individuals may recognize false or misleading content when asked to evaluate it, but social, emotional, motivational, or cultural factors often override this judgment when deciding what to share—and where we share online.¹⁵

If people cannot grasp why and when it matters to pause before sharing, or if sharing is driven by group identity, social validation, or emotional reaction, then the benefits of digital literacy remain limited in real-world contexts. That means efforts to combat misinformation must go beyond teaching accuracy skills to also address the social and psychological drivers of sharing behavior. To be effective, interventions should help people reflect not only on how to evaluate information but also on when sharing is appropriate and why responsible sharing matters. This may especially be true in high-stakes or emotionally charged situations.

Digitally literate, or literally digital?

A growing limitation of digital literacy is its conceptual ambiguity: it has been argued that the term often serves multiple, or perhaps even sometimes conflicting agendas. For some, digital literacy is about employability and technical competence, while for others it’s about critical engagement or media production. This elasticity has helped the term gain popularity, but it can also confuse educators and learners alike. If the goalposts of what counts as “digital literacy” keep shifting, it becomes harder to assess progress or design instruction that works.

Is it really digital “literacy,” or even “digital” literacy?¹⁶ Fundamentally, both words in “digital literacy” carry assumptions that complicate how we understand the concept. The “literacy” frame tends to lean into text-based practices, even though much of today’s digital environment ranges from algorithms to platforms, where the “literacy” operates beneath the surface of what we can read or interpret. At the same time, framing “the digital” as separate from the analog world obscures how deeply intertwined the two have become. As some critics suggest, we may need new metaphors, such as ecologies, to better reflect how digital systems shape everything from communication to civic life, in often invisible ways. 

Cognitive overload and skill gaps 

While digital literacy offers many advantages, it can also lead to our cognitive load being strained, especially when users face an overwhelming volume of online information. Without sound filtering and evaluation skills, it’s easy to become fatigued or misled by the information we intake online.¹³ Skill gaps further compound this issue when we’re feeling cognitively strained. For instance, many individuals continue to lack access to up-to-date devices or the training needed to use them effectively. This limits their ability to participate fruitfully in education, employment, and civic life itself—deepening that digital divide.¹³

Beyond technical gaps, users often struggle to identify reliable information among billions of online sources. Even the most expert researchers now struggle to disseminate accurate information, as evaluating credibility requires nuanced critical thinking and a deep familiarity with digital cues. These are skills that many haven’t been taught—because they weren’t always needed to learn. The lack of structured guidance in schools and communities leaves learners further vulnerable to misinformation. When digital literacy isn’t at the forefront of education systems, students may develop familiarity with technology that’s only at the tip of the iceberg in the absence of diving deeper into the reasoning skills needed for responsible navigation.¹³

Healthcare equity in the Third Millennium 

As we see shifts toward telemedicine and digital services, increasing digital literacy in healthcare settings as an effective means to consciously use technology has become essential for ensuring equitable access. In a literature review of about 40 papers, Campanozzi et al. (2023) found that digital literacy is widely recognized as a foundation for fair distribution of health services in our increasingly digitized society.¹⁶ The authors explain how promoting digital literacy can’t be a one-off effort. Instead, it requires a structural, society-wide approach that addresses economic, social, and linguistic barriers, especially for vulnerable groups like homebound individuals.

Ensuring digital health equity demands collaboration among patients, caregivers, health professionals, policymakers, and technology providers. Telemedicine is now officially seen as a social determinant of health, meaning digital literacy is more than a technical skill: it's a public health priority. The problem is that rapid technological advancements risk outpacing people’s ability to keep up, potentially widening the digital divide. The paradox is that some digital health tools, such as intuitive health kiosks, work especially well for those with lower digital skills, highlighting the need to balance skill-building with simplifying technology.

Identifying who needs digital literacy support is more complex than it seems: it's not all about grandma or your elderly neighbor. While older adults often face challenges, digital competence varies widely regardless of age or income.¹⁶ Reliable screening tools are needed to target interventions effectively. This is especially crucial in developing countries, where digital literacy is vital for both health and economic development. When we talk about healthcare and the prognosis of physical conditions, we mustn’t forget the importance of anticipating mental health needs in our digital futures.

We need to be honest about how digital literacy goes beyond using technology to include the ability to critically evaluate online health information. Without this, digitally illiterate individuals risk exposure to misleading or false content, which can worsen health outcomes. For these reasons, digital literacy programs must teach both technical skills and awareness of both the strengths and limitations of digital health tools. In this way, digital literacy becomes a foundation for equitable, safe, and effective digital healthcare for all—not just for those of us who know our way around tech.

Digital literacy for health in the elderly: Behavioural insights from China

Aside from healthcare contexts in the West, digital literacy is becoming essential across the globe, especially for older adults. Chen and Wang (2025) investigated the connection between digital literacy and health in the elderly by analyzing data of nearly 8,000 samples from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) spanning 2016 to 2020.¹⁷ The authors found that higher digital literacy among senior citizens correlates with improved self-reported health status. This suggests that digital proficiency may play a role in promoting better health outcomes for the elderly.

Chen and Wang also explored how digital literacy influences health through other factors such as social support. Findings indicate that digitally literate seniors are more likely to engage with online communities and maintain social connections, which can alleviate feelings of isolation and contribute to better health.¹⁷ This highlights the importance of digital skills in facilitating social interactions that support well-being.

A key caveat is that the benefits of digital literacy are not uniformly distributed across all groups. The positive effects are more pronounced among younger seniors (ages 60–69), urban residents, and those with higher education levels. In contrast, older seniors, rural dwellers, and individuals with limited education face challenges in acquiring digital skills. In turn, this limits their ability to reap these health benefits compared to other groups. This disparity underscores the need for targeted interventions to bridge the digital divide among the elderly—yet we must remember the digital divide is not necessarily age-dependent, though it's something we need to keep thinking about when it comes to healthcare.

Chen and Wang's research underscores the potential of digital literacy as a tool for enhancing the health of older adults. By focusing on digital skills, especially among underserved populations, policymakers and healthcare providers can support healthier aging. Tailored programs that address the specific needs of various senior groups are crucial for ensuring that the advantages of digital connectivity are accessible to all.

Beyond Access: How can we leverage digital solutions to improve mental health interventions?

With about 1 in 5 adults experiencing mental illness every year, mental health solutions continue to be pertinent. In this piece, TDL columnist Laura Detter discusses what we can do for our mental health, including digital solutions for how we intervene with our own mental health treatments and supports.

Amplifying User Abilities: The Behavior-Changing Magic of Digital Accessibility 

Digital literacy can be just as much about design as it is about information. In this article, TDL UX lead and columnist Maricela Arizaga talks about accessibility issues in the digital age, such as the spectrum of abilities, designing for abilities over barriers, and making behavioral design accessible in itself.

1. Digital Literacy. (2024, April). Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL). https://www.carl-abrc.ca/advance-teaching-learning/digital-literacy/#:~:text=UNESCO%20defines%20digital%20literacy%20as,employment%2C%20decent%20jobs%20and%20entrepreneurship
2. Digital Literacy. (n.d.). Government of Ontario. https://www.dcp.edu.gov.on.ca/en/program-planning/transferable-skills/digital-literacy
3. Brown, C. (2019, September 1). Chapter 1: Introduction to Digital Literacy – Digital Citizenship Toolkit. Toronto Metropolitan University Pressbooks. https://pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca/digcit/chapter/chapter-1/#:~:text=Digital%20literacy%20is%20a%20relatively,role%20in%20the%20digital%20world
4. Bandura, R., & Leal, E. M. (2022, July 18). The Digital Literacy Imperative. CSIS | Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/digital-literacy-imperative
5. What is Digital Literacy? (n.d.). ABC Life Literacy Canada. https://abclifeliteracy.ca/literacy/digital-literacy/
6. Belshaw, D. (2016). The essential elements of digital literacies. Doug Belshaw.
7. Mills, K. (2015). Literacy Theories for the Digital Age: Social, Critical, Multimodal, Spatial, Material and Sensory Lenses. New Perspectives in Language and Education.. 10.21832/9781783094639. 
8. Ventimiglia, P., & Pullman, G. (2016, March 7). From Written to Digital: The New Literacy. EDUCAUSE. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/3/from-written-to-digital-the-new-literacy
9. Worzel, R. (2012, March 1). Digital Literacy: A Revolution Begins. TEACH Magazine. https://teachmag.com/digital-literacy-a-revolution-begins/
10. The impact of digital literacy in the workplace. (2023, September 17). ABC Literacy Life Canada. https://abclifeliteracy.ca/news/the-impact-of-digital-literacy-in-the-workplace/
11. van Kessel R, Wong BLH, Clemens T, Brand H. Digital health literacy as a super determinant of health: More than simply the sum of its parts. Internet Interv. 2022 Feb 7;27:100500. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100500. PMID: 35242586; PMCID: PMC8861384.
12. Arias López, M. D., Ong, B. A., Borrat Frigola, X., Fernández, A. L., Hicklent, R. S., Obeles, A. J., Rocimo, A. M., & Celi, L. A. (2023). Digital literacy as a new determinant of health: A scoping review. PLOS Digital Health, 2(10), e0000279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000279
13. What is Digital Literacy, Its Importance, and Challenges? (2023, June 6). EdTechReview. https://www.edtechreview.in/trends-insights/insights/what-is-digital-literacy-its-importance-and-challenges/
14. A.M. Guess, M. Lerner, B. Lyons, J.M. Montgomery, B. Nyhan, J. Reifler, & N. Sircar, A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (27) 15536-15545, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117 (2020)
15. Sirlin, N., Epstein, Z., Arechar, A. A., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Digital literacy is associated with more discerning accuracy judgments but not sharing intentions. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-83
16. Campanozzi LL, Gibelli F, Bailo P, Nittari G, Sirignano A, Ricci G. The role of digital literacy in achieving health equity in the third millennium society: A literature review. Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;11:1109323. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109323. PMID: 36891330; PMCID: PMC9986277.
17. Chen, X., & Wang, N. (2025). How does digital literacy affect the health status of senior citizens? Micro-level evidence from the China Family Panel Studies data. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12314-7