Tree Testing

The Basic Idea

Imagine you’re planning a weekend getaway to a new city. Your search has led you to a local tourism website and you’re browsing around for things to do and places to stay. Using the website’s navigation system, you’re looking for specific content to help you plan your trip, such as restaurant recommendations, upcoming events, hotel deals, and neighborhood guides.

You find this information right where you expect it to be, located under relevant menu categories labeled “hotels,” “events,” and “activities.” Because the website is structured predictably and the navigation labels are clear and descriptive, you can easily locate all the information you need.

How do website designers ensure their websites achieve this level of usability? They test their navigation systems on real users.

Tree testing is a user experience (UX) research method to evaluate how easily users can find key resources and information on a website or app. This testing method focuses on the navigation tree (also called the sitemap), which represents the behind-the-scenes organizational structure of a website.1

A website’s navigation tree is structured a lot like a literal tree. The homepage acts as the trunk, the main pages or menu categories (about, shop, contact, blog, etc.) are the large branches that connect directly to the trunk, and the individual pages of the website (individual product pages, blog articles, etc.) form the tree’s twigs and leaves.

You can get a sense of a website’s navigation tree when interacting with the menu bar at the top of the page. Typically, top-level menu items link to the site’s main pages or “parent” categories, with subcategories or individual “child” pages nested under these. The menu labels act as signposts, telling you where you can find specific content within the hierarchical structure of the website. Tree testing helps designers determine if these navigation labels make sense to users and if the website is organized logically and predictably.2

Tree testing essentially isolates the navigation tree so that it can be evaluated on its own. During tree testing, users are presented with a text-based version of the tree — with labels for each category and page. Users are given a specific task and then asked to navigate to the location in the tree where they would expect to locate content that would help them with this task.

If we were testing the tree in the above image, we may ask participants to look for information that would help them manage their healthcare costs. Participants would then click through the tree, starting with the top-level categories, until they reached the location where they would expect to find this information. In this case, we’re testing if “Insurance Providers” is in the most logical location in the tree. The results of this tree test would reveal how many people found the correct information, how long it took, how many different paths they took to get there, and whether they got lost along the way.

Users need to be able to find content before they can use it — findability precedes usability.


— Louis Rosenfeld, author of Information Architecture: For the Web and Beyond

About the Author

Smiling woman with long hair stands in front of a lush plant with pink and yellow flowers, near what appears to be a house exterior with horizontal siding and a staircase.

Kira Warje

Kira holds a degree in Psychology with an extended minor in Anthropology. Fascinated by all things human, she has written extensively on cognition and mental health, often leveraging insights about the human mind to craft actionable marketing content for brands. She loves talking about human quirks and motivations, driven by the belief that behavioural science can help us all lead healthier, happier, and more sustainable lives. Occasionally, Kira dabbles in web development and enjoys learning about the synergy between psychology and UX design.

About us

We are the leading applied research & innovation consultancy

Our insights are leveraged by the most ambitious organizations

Image

I was blown away with their application and translation of behavioral science into practice. They took a very complex ecosystem and created a series of interventions using an innovative mix of the latest research and creative client co-creation. I was so impressed at the final product they created, which was hugely comprehensive despite the large scope of the client being of the world's most far-reaching and best known consumer brands. I'm excited to see what we can create together in the future.

Heather McKee

BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST

GLOBAL COFFEEHOUSE CHAIN PROJECT

OUR CLIENT SUCCESS

$0M

Annual Revenue Increase

By launching a behavioral science practice at the core of the organization, we helped one of the largest insurers in North America realize $30M increase in annual revenue.

0%

Increase in Monthly Users

By redesigning North America's first national digital platform for mental health, we achieved a 52% lift in monthly users and an 83% improvement on clinical assessment.

0%

Reduction In Design Time

By designing a new process and getting buy-in from the C-Suite team, we helped one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world reduce software design time by 75%.

0%

Reduction in Client Drop-Off

By implementing targeted nudges based on proactive interventions, we reduced drop-off rates for 450,000 clients belonging to USA's oldest debt consolidation organizations by 46%

Read Next

Notes illustration

Eager to learn about how behavioral science can help your organization?