Lower body of a woman sitting in a conference taking notes.

Why Most Training Fails and How to Make Yours Work

read time - icon

0 min read

Aug 13, 2024

We invest significant time and resources in upskilling and reskilling our employees—encouraging or mandating their attendance at professional development courses, webinars, and training sessions. But are these investments actually leading to the transformations we hope for?

Unfortunately, for many employers, it doesn’t look like it. Research shows that we often attribute more to these short-sprint, one-off efforts than they truly accomplish. Only 12% of employees actually apply new skills learned from training provided by their employers. We often place unrealistic expectations on training, assuming that a brief, two-hour workshop can significantly enhance an employee's capacity. Even more concerning is our tendency to prioritize inputs over outcomes: we focus more on conducting the training sessions rather than ensuring their desired impact. Instead, true training success goes beyond the training session itself; it lies in understanding participant realities and identifying optimal ways to fundamentally shift their mindsets and capacities.

The reality is that gaining expertise and building capabilities takes time and—let’s face it—real-life experience. Most of us can relate to the fact that the majority of what we do in our jobs day-to-day, we learned by doing them in our jobs day-to-day. So why do we attribute so much to short training sessions? What is the best way to leverage these relatively light efforts? And, more importantly, what does effective training look like—and how do we know when we’ve achieved it?

Overestimating the Impact of Training

Our overreliance on quick fixes is not a new phenomenon. It’s true in adult learning efforts across sectors and industries and it’s true in more traditional forms of education as well. Human beings are naturally optimistic, which often leads to the self-serving bias, where we attribute negative results of training to external factors rather than the quality of the training itself. If a training session doesn’t lead to employees applying their learnings successfully, we are more likely to blame it on participant characteristics, for example, rather than shortcomings of the training they delivered. 

On the other hand, we are also hardwired to attribute positive reactions to the training we develop due to confirmation bias. This bias may lead us to seek out or interpret information in a way that confirms our belief that the training has been highly impactful while discounting or ignoring contradictory evidence. Our confirmation bias can lead us to have an exaggerated understanding of the impact of short training sessions.

We tend to overestimate the impact of trainings we create because our minds rely on shortcuts, making us vulnerable to biases. By recognizing these biases and taking time to reflect before making important decisions in training design, we can challenge our assumptions and reduce the influence of these biases.

Setting Realistic Training Goals

We’re not necessarily wrong in believing that training sessions can work—they just don’t always accomplish what we think they accomplish. Training is not a one-stop shop. The adjustment necessary to embrace their potential is not in having a reduced expectation of impact but a reframed understanding of it. We need to stop thinking of training as one-and-done efforts and think of them as teasers: whetting the palate enough to begin a journey of learning that will expand well beyond the training itself to stick.

This is not about setting a low bar. For instance, reducing the amount of content included in your training allows you to refine and enhance its quality because you can spend more time honing in on key ideas that stick instead of lightly brushing over many things that don’t. We’ve done many workshops and training sessions at TDL, and believe me, scaling back to dig deep is much harder work than throwing everything but the kitchen sink at your trainees. So no, we are not in need of setting the bar for trainees lower but rather setting the bar for trainers higher

Here are three goal-setting mistakes we see organizations make time and time again in training and what you can do to avoid these pitfalls:

1. Ill-informed or Unrealistic Goals

Be clear about the purpose of your training and consider ways to reinforce learnings from your one-off session to achieve your desired results. After all, continuous learning opportunities foster long-term change

However, don’t overlook the short-term benefits of training sessions, such as building rapport, creating collaborative opportunities, generating ideas, and fostering a sense of community around specific topics or initiatives. Recognizing these (more realistic) short-term benefits allows you to optimize your training efforts and maximize their impact.

2. Condensing Instead of Omitting

Do not make materials more succinct or condensed in order to reduce content. If you are covering too much, omit the nonessentials. Be realistic about participants’ capacity to retain the information you share and the participants’ immediate need for that information. Know that too much information can keep participants from retaining any of it (this is called information overload). Instead of trying to cover it all, focus on ensuring that participants are developing the scaffolding needed to walk away from the training and build on it. 

3. Focusing on Answers Instead of Questions

Start with your desired outcomes (like your immediate Calls to Action (CTAs) or desired shift in employee behavior) to make sure that your inputs help you get there (like training activities to lead employees to the desired CTA or behavior). When defining CTAs, it's crucial to set realistic expectations. Recognize that trainees will likely still need support or practice after the training. With this in mind, emphasize equipping them with the skills to know what questions to ask and whom to approach, rather than assuming they will immediately have all the answers after attending the training. This approach ensures a more practical and effective training outcome.

Achieving Your Realistic Training Goals

So what does this mean for how you actually conduct training? Planning your training should include thoughtful approaches to engagement, learning, and actionability. Ask yourself: is your training built in a manner that will lead to meaningful participation? Is your training successfully going to bridge key knowledge or skill gaps? And last but certainly not least, is your training going to lead to the desired shifts in behavior in the long run? Below are some ways to work towards engaging, learning-centered, and actionable training. 

Engagement

Training in a manner that will inspire meaningful participation

  • Interactive Content: Incorporate interactive elements such as polls, quizzes, other game elements, and surveys to keep participants actively involved. 
  • Storytelling: Mix up your methods with lectures, group discussions, hands-on activities, and multimedia presentations. Most importantly, share relevant stories to illustrate points and make the material more relatable. Encourage participants to share their experiences and knowledge with each other. Leverage intrinsic motivation by connecting learning to personal and professional goals.
  • Pre-Work and Post-Work Assignments: Give participants tasks to complete before and after the training to reinforce learning and guarantee it’s not a one-off effort.
  • Networking Opportunities: Create opportunities for participants to network and build connections with each other so that you are not the only person they are learning from–trainees often learn just as much from one another as they do from facilitators. This also helps create a culture of learning that will serve to reinforce training content.

Learning

Training that successfully bridges knowledge or skill gaps

  • Problem-Based Learning (PBL): Engage learners with opportunities to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Go beyond just giving example problems and solutions; provide opportunities for participants to work through these examples on their own or in groups.
  • Real-World Applications: Use case studies, examples, role-playing, and scenarios relevant to the participants' work to illustrate concepts, as well as incorporate exercises and simulations that allow them to apply what they’ve learned.
  • Community of Practice: Build communities of practice (CoP) to facilitate ongoing learning and professional development. CoPs are groups who collaborate regularly to exchange knowledge, learn from each other, and improve their practices based on the training provided.
  • Spaced Repetition: Use spaced repetition techniques to enhance long-term retention of information. Spaced repetition is a learning technique that involves reviewing information at specific intervals over time. The goal is to reinforce memory by revisiting material (e.g. using different examples or tasks) just before it is forgotten, which strengthens the retention of that information.

Action

Training that leads to the desired shifts in behavior in the long run

  • Self-Assessment and Reflection: Encourage self-assessment and reflection to promote self-awareness and continuous improvement.
  • Supportive Learning Environment: Create a supportive and inclusive learning environment that accommodates diverse learners.
  • Job-Embedded Learning: Integrate learning into the workplace through job-embedded training and professional development. This can also include embedding explicit opportunities for employees to reflect on applying training CTAs.

Workforce training can be categorized as either proactive or reactive. Proactive training focuses on preparing for future needs by bridging skill gaps for future work demands, promoting growth and leadership, and fostering inclusion and well-being. In contrast, reactive training responds to immediate challenges like technological changes, market shifts, regulation compliance, management changes, and performance issues. 

For both types, engaging, learning-centered, and actionable training goes beyond simply understanding employee needs; it also involves appreciating the context in which these needs arise. When planning training, account for the environmental realities and challenges your employees face. In proactive training, sustaining learning can be challenging since there may not be an immediate need to apply the acquired skills. Therefore, you may need to invest additional time in engaging with trainees outside of the training session. In reactive training, where employees face pressures from a rapidly changing environment, trainees may also need extra support. In this instance, appreciating the context may mean encouraging more interactions among trainees and providing opportunities for peer-to-peer support to enhance engagement and application of the training.

Mastering Training

We dedicate so much time and effort into training our employees, with little knowledge of or attention to its true impact. Our tendency to overestimate the impact of brief training sessions is influenced by cognitive biases. Instead of expecting unrealistic and immediate results from one-off sessions, we need to view training as an ongoing process that begins before the session and continues well beyond it. To make your training work for you and your participants, focus on engagement, active learning strategies, and sustainable behavioral changes. Effective training is a catalyst for continuous learning and development, not a quick fix.

About the Author

Dr. Maraki Kebede

Dr. Maraki Kebede

Maraki is a Project Leader at The Decision Lab. Her research focuses on social and spatial equity in education globally, and has been featured in peer-reviewed journals, edited volumes, and international conferences. Maraki has worked with several international organizations to craft pathways to empower underserved school-aged children and youth in Africa, including UNESCO, the World Bank, the Institute of International Education, and Geneva Global Inc.

About us

We are the leading applied research & innovation consultancy

Our insights are leveraged by the most ambitious organizations

Image

I was blown away with their application and translation of behavioral science into practice. They took a very complex ecosystem and created a series of interventions using an innovative mix of the latest research and creative client co-creation. I was so impressed at the final product they created, which was hugely comprehensive despite the large scope of the client being of the world's most far-reaching and best known consumer brands. I'm excited to see what we can create together in the future.

Heather McKee

BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST

GLOBAL COFFEEHOUSE CHAIN PROJECT

OUR CLIENT SUCCESS

$0M

Annual Revenue Increase

By launching a behavioral science practice at the core of the organization, we helped one of the largest insurers in North America realize $30M increase in annual revenue.

0%

Increase in Monthly Users

By redesigning North America's first national digital platform for mental health, we achieved a 52% lift in monthly users and an 83% improvement on clinical assessment.

0%

Reduction In Design Time

By designing a new process and getting buy-in from the C-Suite team, we helped one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world reduce software design time by 75%.

0%

Reduction in Client Drop-Off

By implementing targeted nudges based on proactive interventions, we reduced drop-off rates for 450,000 clients belonging to USA's oldest debt consolidation organizations by 46%

Read Next

A group of people in a modern meeting room, some seated and working at a large table with laptops and cameras, while others stand and converse. The atmosphere is casual, with natural light filtering through large windows in the background.
Insight

Why Teams Make Bad Decisions

Sometimes, the best way to avoid group decision-making failures is not to make decisions as a group at all.

Notes illustration

Eager to learn about how behavioral science can help your organization?