Hands cradle a crumpled ball made of $100 bills adorned with bracelets in an outdoor setting with green vegetation.

Charity, Parochialism, and the Inefficiencies of Altruism

read time - icon

0 min read

Nov 14, 2017

Most of us are good and charitable people. Whether it is pure altruism, the good feeling we get, or just a matter of doing it because others do, many of us have a desire to give to charity in some form or another (Brooks, 2007). Last year in the United Kingdom for example, people donated around £9.7 billion to charity (CAF, 2017), with medical research being the most popular cause with 26% of total donations, and overseas aid and disaster relief getting 19%.

However, is this money going to the right places? Whilst there has been an increasing amount of research and attention given to the behavioral science of giving (BIT, 2013), the issue of why we specifically donate our money to the places that we do, and where it ends up, has been neglected. Fortunately, some of these issues can be addressed using simple theories from the field of behavioral science.

References

Andreoni, James. “Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving.” The economic journal 100, no. 401 (1990): 464-477.

Baron, Jonathan, and Ewa Szymanska. “Heuristics and biases in charity.” The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (2011): 215-235.

Team, Behavioral Insights. “Applying behavioral insights to charitable giving.” Cabinet Office (2013).

Brooks, Arthur C. “Does giving make us prosperous?.” Journal of Economics and Finance 31, no. 3 (2007): 403-411.

Cancer Research UK. “Annual Report and Accounts 2016/2017.” Cancer Research UK (2017). https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/cruk_annual_report_2016-17.pdf

Charities Aid Foundation. “The CAF UK Giving Report 2017.” CAF UK Giving 2017. April 2017. https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-publications/caf-uk-giving-web.pdf?sfvrsn=8

Rotemberg, Julio J. “Charitable giving when altruism and similarity are linked.” Journal of Public Economics 114 (2014): 36-49.

Small, Deborah A., and George Loewenstein. “Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability.” Journal of Risk and uncertainty 26, no. 1 (2003): 5-16.

Zajonc, Robert B. “Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.” Journal of personality and social psychology 9, no. 2p2 (1968): 1.

About the Author

A man with short curly hair and a beard smiles, wearing a white dress shirt and black tie, standing against a plain beige background.

William Phillips

University of Cambridge

Will completed his undergraduate degree in Mathematical Economics at the University of Birmingham, before moving on to Cambridge where he received his MPhil in Economics. It is here where he developed his interest in behavioural science, being able to discuss ideas with some of the leading thinkers in the academic world. He now works at a market intelligence and talent consultancy in London.

About us

We are the leading applied research & innovation consultancy

Our insights are leveraged by the most ambitious organizations

Image

I was blown away with their application and translation of behavioral science into practice. They took a very complex ecosystem and created a series of interventions using an innovative mix of the latest research and creative client co-creation. I was so impressed at the final product they created, which was hugely comprehensive despite the large scope of the client being of the world's most far-reaching and best known consumer brands. I'm excited to see what we can create together in the future.

Heather McKee

BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST

GLOBAL COFFEEHOUSE CHAIN PROJECT

OUR CLIENT SUCCESS

$0M

Annual Revenue Increase

By launching a behavioral science practice at the core of the organization, we helped one of the largest insurers in North America realize $30M increase in annual revenue.

0%

Increase in Monthly Users

By redesigning North America's first national digital platform for mental health, we achieved a 52% lift in monthly users and an 83% improvement on clinical assessment.

0%

Reduction In Design Time

By designing a new process and getting buy-in from the C-Suite team, we helped one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world reduce software design time by 75%.

0%

Reduction in Client Drop-Off

By implementing targeted nudges based on proactive interventions, we reduced drop-off rates for 450,000 clients belonging to USA's oldest debt consolidation organizations by 46%

Read Next

Notes illustration

Eager to learn about how behavioral science can help your organization?