The negativity bias has a significant impact on our individual decision-making. Because we spend so much time scrutinizing negative memories we tend to keep this information at the front of our minds, affecting our future choices. However, while being cautious can be a good thing, the negativity bias can deter us from using logic and reasoning leading to poorly thought-out decisions, and possibly, unfavorable outcomes.

Interestingly, the negativity bias may play a role in beliefs about self-efficacy as well as our self-esteem. During our most formative years we already begin to develop beliefs about our abilities which can translate to changes in our performance. To measure this, Müller-Pinzler and colleagues constructed the “learning of own performance” (or LOOP) task, where participants were given direct feedback on their abilities. They found that individuals show a negativity bias toward updating their own performance, but when listening to the feedback on the performance of others, they attended equally to positive and negative information. 

While this may help us to recognize our mistakes, the authors warn that the negativity bias is not something to be taken lightly. Primarily attending to and giving more weight to negative information can lead us to forming harmful beliefs about our competence and general ability. This can contribute to low self-esteem and anxiety, bleeding into many aspects of our lives.¹⁷

At work, for example, we might start to obsess over small errors or criticisms, which can make us hesitant to take risks or seek opportunities for growth. In our personal relationships, negativity bias might cause us to dwell on conflicts, making it harder to trust others and form strong bonds. Alongside confirmation bias—which causes us to interpret new information as confirmation of our existing beliefs—negativity bias can launch us into a downward spiral, where every new experience that confirms our negative view only strengthens our beliefs. The compounding effects of negativity bias may even contribute to disorders such as anxiety and depression.²²

Being too risk-averse and letting negativity bias cloud decision-making can have significant consequences on outcomes. For corporations in competitive and volatile markets, negativity bias can significantly affect competitive advantages. 

An example of systemic challenges resulting from the negativity bias can be seen in the case of Kodak, once the world’s leading film photography company. When the market began shifting towards digital photography, Kodak was too risk-averse to innovate its products. Negativity bias prevented Kodak from seizing its competitive advantage and market presence to continue to develop to maintain mainstream success. Instead, Kodak focused on what they identified as their core strength, film photography, which eventually became an outdated industry. This business decision made Kodak lose its competitive position to rival photography companies like Sony, Fujifilm, and Canon, all of which adapted to the changing photography landscape. As a result, Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2002.⁵

Negativity bias can prevent organizations from innovating and taking necessary risks to adjust to changing consumer needs. By avoiding negativity bias from clouding decision-making, corporations and individuals can make better, calculated decisions without bias. 

Paul Rozin and Edward Poyzman, the researchers who coined negativity bias, have identified four elements that explain why the bias manifests: negative potency, steeper negative gradients, negativity dominance, and negative differentiation.⁶

Negative Potency

Negative potency describes the idea that though negative and positive events or memories may be equal in magnitude or emotionality, they are not necessarily equally salient. Simply put, these events stick out to us. We feel the consequences of negative events much more.⁶

Steeper Negative Gradients 

Rozin and Royzman refer to negative and positive gradients as the perceived emotional slope of an event. For example, an upcoming dental surgery is regarded as increasingly negative as the date of the appointment approaches, meaning there is a steep negative gradient. The researchers found that positive developments then have a flatter gradient in comparison to adverse events.⁶

Negativity Dominance 

Rozin and Royzman describe negative dominance as the tendency for ambiguous events to skew towards an overall negative interpretation. This interpretation overshadows the actual average sum of our positive and negative components. To summarize, we typically view the whole of an event or moment as more negative than the sum of its parts.⁶

Negative Differentiation 

Negative differentiation states that since negative events are more complicated than their positive counterparts, we require a more significant mobilization of cognitive resources to minimize the event's consequences and deal with the experience, making it a more memorable and intense experience.⁷

 Negative differentiation is consistent with substantial research indicating that negative emotions are more complicated than positive ones. Research studies have suggested that as a result of this complexity, human vocabulary describing negative emotions and events is much more vibrant and descriptive than positive vocabulary.⁸

Negativity bias significantly impacts how we make decisions, motivate ourselves, and interact with one another. 

Decision-Making

We should be aware of the negativity bias as it can significantly impact our decision-making ability. When making decisions, individuals who fall prey to negativity bias typically outweigh or focus too heavily on an outcome’s potential costs or negatives.¹ Skewing risk and possible adverse outcomes could lead to poor decision-making. 

Motivation

Psychological research suggests that negativity bias impacts our motivation and ability to complete tasks. We have more motivation to complete a job when we are trying to avoid a loss than if we are motivated by a means to gain something. Based on whether an action is framed in a positive or negative context can change how driven we are to complete a task.⁹

To avoid negativity bias, we must first understand the bias and acknowledge how it can develop in our thinking and decision-making. Once a general understanding grows, we can do the following to avoid negative bias: 

Mindfulness

A study conducted in 2011 by Kiken and Shook found that practicing mindful breathing, a form of meditation, increased positive judgments and engaged higher levels of optimism in participants. Compared to other control groups, participants who practiced mindful breathing performed better at tests requiring them to categorize positive stimuli. Researchers identified that mindfulness practice significantly impacts the negativity bias.¹¹

Focus on the Positive 

Negativity bias affects us by making us have a stronger reaction to negative events compared to positive onesAn exercise to curb this bias would include focusing on positive events and savoring those experiences to create positive memories. Attempting to engage fully in pleasant sensations, and reflect on the positive developments occurring at the moment.¹²

Are our brains wired to think negatively?

Research suggests that our brains are inherently wired to process negative information more intensely than positive information. This has been extensively studied using advanced neuroimaging techniques such as event-related brain potentials (ERPs), which measure electrical activity in the brain in response to different stimuli. 

One such study found that the brain categorizes information based on emotional valence—whether it elicits negative, neutral, or positive feelings—and this occurs very early on in information processing.¹⁸ Not only that, but the brain shows a much larger response to negative than positive stimuli, even if the two stimuli are of equal magnitude (equally extreme and emotionally stimulating). This shows that negativity bias is an automatic process rather than a result of conscious decision-making.

Unfortunately, this means our brains are simply built to overreact to the negative aspects of our surroundings. The good news is that you can consciously overcome your mind’s natural tendency to fixate on negative stimuli with the two techniques we mentioned above: one, by focusing on the positive aspects of a situation and two, by relying on mindfulness practices to bring conscious awareness to your emotional experience. If you can incorporate more optimism into your general outlook, you’ll have an easier time counteracting the negativity bias.

Does negativity bias have an evolutionary function?

Negativity bias is thought to have an adaptive purpose, helping us explore the environment and avoid potential threats.¹³ This evolutionary hypothesis is based on a theory from Cacioppo & Berntson who argue that there are two key components to our affect system—the system involved in processing environmental stimuli.¹⁹ The first, a positivity offset, is our tendency to interpret neutral information as mildly positive. This drives us to approach new stimuli and motivates us to learn about our environment. The second is negativity bias. As you well know by now, negativity bias causes us to be hyper-sensitive to negative information, and this drives us to exhibit self-preservative behavior even at the slightest suggestion of risk. 

Together, these mechanisms encouraged our ancestors to explore their surroundings, seek out food, and engage socially with others while remaining vigilant against threats like predators, hostile strangers, and poisonous foods. But this built-in survival mechanism can still be useful today. It encourages us to seek out new experiences and meet new people while still allowing us to be cautious and avoid risky or negative experiences.

However, negativity bias is not quite as useful to us now as it once was. We don’t encounter an abundance of threats to our personal safety in our modern day-to-day life. Despite this, our brains focus on negative information even in safe environments, making it difficult to maintain a balanced perspective for optimal decision-making.

How does negativity bias affect social-emotional development?

Negativity bias seems to play a crucial role in how children learn to understand their emotions and the emotions of others. Very early on, infants display a sensitivity to emotional information. Newborns can distinguish happy from fearful facial expressions, while infants (as young as four months old) can distinguish happy expressions from neutral and angry faces. Importantly, these younger children cannot distinguish angry from neutral expressions—they are far more attuned to positive than negative stimuli at this stage.¹³ Later in the first year of life, infants begin to understand that angry faces signal a threat, suggesting that this is around the time when negativity bias emerges.

Once children show a negativity bias, they appear to learn more negative information than positive information. For example, they are more likely to avoid a novel stimulus in response to fear cues than to approach the same novel stimulus in response to positive cues.¹³ Children further show enhanced memory for negative over positive emotions. They also need fewer examples of negative behavior to conclude that someone has negative traits than examples of good behavior to infer positive traits. Overall, negative information holds more weight than positive information when informing children’s social judgments about others, suggesting that the negativity bias has important developmental functions.

Are some individuals more prone to negativity bias than others?

While the negativity bias is a common cognitive tendency among humans, some people may be more prone to its effects than others. Still, it’s not exactly clear what causes these differences. Cross-national research shows that there is a high degree of variation in how individuals react to negative vs. positive news, but this is unrelated to country-specific contextual factors.²⁰ This finding suggests that differences in negativity bias might not be primarily driven by cultural differences.

Other studies have explored whether people’s political ideology has anything to do with their propensity toward negativity bias. While some research shows that people with stronger emotional reactions to negative information tend to hold more conservative attitudes, one extensive cross-national study failed to find a consistent link between negativity bias and political ideology.²¹

Researchers have, however, demonstrated a link between negativity bias and negative affect.²² People who are naturally more prone to negative emotions like anger, sadness, and anxiety are significantly more likely to show a negativity bias. Overall, younger people are more likely to interpret ambiguous information negatively and exhibit a stronger negative valence bias than older adults. Younger people also seem to develop regulatory skills to manage their emotions and judgments as they grow older. What does this mean for adults? The researchers suggest that older adults who fail to develop these regulatory skills might experience greater negativity bias into adulthood, increasing the risk of associated disorders like anxiety and depression. Interestingly, social connectedness plays an important role in moderating negativity bias for people of all ages.

Negativity bias is assumed to have been an adaptive evolutionary function developed by humans thousands of years ago. By continually being exposed to immediate environmental threats, our ancestors developed a negativity bias to survive.¹³

Psychologists Paul Rozin and Edward Royzman first documented negativity bias in their 2001 paper, “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” The paper hypothesized that humans and animals give higher weight to negative entities and that this manifested in 4 different ways: negative potency, steeper negative gradients, negativity dominance, and negative differentiation. These four concepts have been widely publicized and used to analyze negativity bias. The researchers suggested that adverse events seem to be dominant as negative entities are more contagious than positive entities.⁶

As discussed above, negativity bias can hold companies back from exploring other ventures. It is strategic to weigh both the pros and cons before beginning a new project, but holding back for too long can lead to companies losing their advantage or missing the ideal entry to a new market. 

Negativity bias also plays a massive role in terms of brand reputation and customer reviews. Because we are prone to pay more attention to negative information, even a few poor product reviews can cause a consumer to think twice before investing in the item or service. We let this type of information affect us more, leading us to put more weight on negative reviews. Managing and responding to negative reviews in a constructive and public manner can help to mitigate these effects. Showing potential customers that you stand behind your product and are confident in your ability to resolve any issue may also increase brand loyalty and prompt new consumers to try your product.

Social media algorithms are designed to ensure that you are delivered content similar to what you interact with on a daily basis. Globally, we pay more attention to negative media, and when presented with this type of content, we tend to have a stronger reaction.¹⁵ The more time you spend reading and engaging with a specific type of post or video, the more that kind of content will pop up on your newsfeed and recommended tabs. Because we’re predisposed to focus more on negative content, we process it more carefully than positive stimuli, thus devoting more time to it.¹⁶ In doing this, certain news stories or sources get pushed into our feeds, allowing us to consume the same type of content.

However, the good thing about algorithms is that they can change. By engaging with positive news along with more serious or negative content, one can diversify their feeds and bring a little more positivity to their social media experience.

A study conducted in 1998 by Tiffany Ito and colleagues concluded that humans react more intensely to negative stimuli, be it pictures, videos, or words. The study was conducted by showing each participant 33 different photos and measuring their brains’ electrical activity to identify their responses. The researchers presented neutral images (such as a plate and an electrical outlet), positive photos (such as people enjoying themselves), and negative images (such as a gun pointed to the individual holding the picture).¹⁴

The researchers found that images that generated the most brain activity, also called Event-Related Brain Potentials (ERPs), occurred when participants held the negative images. Thus, the results concluded that individuals naturally responded more intensely to negative stimuli than neutral or positive stimuli.³  

It is common to feel like the news is filled with only negative and dark stories. Researchers initially hypothesized that negative coverage is more attractive and attention-grabbing for potential readers and customers, especially compared to positive coverage. 

Research conducted by Dr. Soroka and her colleagues in 2019 investigated whether demand for negative information is as prevalent as assumed and if that desire for negative stories is globally consistent. Her study reported results from 17 different countries across six continents. Specifically, she examined the psychophysiological reactions to video news content and the effect on individuals consuming these videos. The study concluded that globally, humans are more physiologically activated by negative news stories than positive ones.¹⁵

What it is

Negativity bias is a cognitive bias that explains why negative events or feelings typically have a more significant impact on our psychological state than positive events or feelings, even when they are of equal proportion. Negativity Bias is closely linked to loss aversion, a cognitive bias that describes why the pain of losing is psychologically twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining. 

Why it happens

Researchers Paul Rozin and Edward Poyzman, have identified four elements that explain why negativity bias manifests itself: negative potency, steeper negative gradients, negativity dominance, and negative differentiation.

Example 1 – Stimuli 

A research study by Ito and colleagues in 1998 found that study participants responded more intensively to negative stimuli than to positive or neutral stimuli. The study was conducted by showing each participant 33 different photos and measuring their brains’ electrical activity to identify their responses.  The research study found that images that generated the most brain activity occurred when participants viewed the negative images. 

Example 2 – Media

Negative news coverage is more attractive and attention-grabbing to readers, so news cycles globally focus on negative stories. A study by Dr. Soroka and colleagues in 2019 assessed the global demand for negative information in news cycles across 17 countries. Her research found that globally, the average human is physiologically more activated by negative news stories than positive ones. 

How to avoid it

To avoid negativity bias, after we develop an understanding of the bias, we can prevent it by using the following techniques. First, we can recognize negativity bias or an overfocus on negative thoughts and then try to challenge them and replace them with useful ones. Using techniques like Albert Ellis’ ABC technique can aid in this. Additionally, practicing mindfulness and focusing on positive thoughts can all assist in curtailing negativity bias. 

TDL Brief: Online Toxicity

This article discusses the nature of online negativity and why the internet seems to breed these attitudes. While exploring multiple examples, the piece touches on people's confidence when they are anonymized behind a screen, behavioral contagion, as well as possibly remedies and interventions

The ABC Model

This entry in the TDL reference guide explains how to use Albert Ellis’ ABC model in adverse situations. Specifically, this technique is used in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to encourage individuals to be aware of their emotions and deal with negative feelings head-on.