The Decision LabCase study
We diagnosed the nine factors driving negative safety interactions between a global rideshare platform and its drivers, then built the global risk-communication guide now rolling out worldwide.

01
Ridesharing is projected to reach $242.7 billion by 2028, and safety concerns are the biggest threat to the trust it runs on. The bind is structural: drivers are contractors, so a platform cannot simply train them, it can only communicate, and communication drivers ignore protects no one. A global rideshare platform asked us to build a worldwide framework for risk communication that drivers would actually engage with.
02
We reviewed the evidence on digital education and risk communication, then went to the people involved: 31 interviews with company executives and surveys of more than 1,350 drivers and riders across the platform's priority markets. The research isolated nine factors behind negative safety interactions, grouped into three themes: Value and Trust, whether drivers believe safety guidance serves them or the company; Accessibility and Structure, whether they can find and use it; and Context and Actionability, whether it applies to the situations they actually face.
A core finding was misalignment, drivers and the platform define safety differently, so we built the framework to align expectations on both sides. We delivered it as an operational risk-communication guide with decision rules, worked examples, and checklists for every team that communicates with drivers.
03
The guide is now rolling out across the platform's global markets, with efficacy pilots underway to measure its effect on driver engagement with safety features. The platform keeps a durable asset: a single evidence-based standard for how it communicates risk to drivers everywhere it operates.